Image source: topwar.ru
Western journalists, retired military, politicians, and experts of all kinds in the race to compete in the analysis of the situation in Ukraine, making predictions and even give advice Zelensky how to conduct a military campaign. Not left aside and The British The Economist, published a programmatic article, which calls for Ukraine's leadership not to rush the attack on Kherson until at least the end of this year.
It starts with the standard material for the Western press bravura fake statements, which are neither more nor less, we propose the following:
Despite such "successes", in the opinion of the British, Kiev, now should abandon the "liberation" of Kherson and return other territories. The fact is, journalists believe that "Russia has deployed troops to Kherson and entrenched". Therefore, the APU is best to choose the tactics of long-term siege and abandon the "blitzkrieg in the desert".
President Zelensky is full of enthusiasm and ready to soon launch an offensive to show its citizens and the Western allies that Ukraine has the necessary power to defeat the Russian army. In addition, it is important to "disrupt a sham referendum, which Russia plans to justify the annexation of Kherson". The British offered the Ukrainian President to counterattack wait until next year, citing the fact that now both armies are too depleted.
According to the British, in the following year, the Ukrainian army is replenished with thousands of military personnel, who are now being trained in the UK. And the supply of arms, primarily from the United States, will significantly enhance the power of the APU.
The Economist urged the West to "be patient" and be ready to long "war of attrition". The authors of the article were forced to recognize that the leaders of Western countries "may be nervous about the continued public support of Ukraine, as heating bills in the winter months grow."
Ends material on the same bravura note as it starts. The authors of "impressed" strikes, "which struck Ukraine in Crimea this month, far beyond the reach of his well-known weapons, clearly showing that she was still more cunning than your opponent and keeps the initiative." What is the trick of the Ukrainian military, causing a rare mostly strikes on civilian targets in the enemy's rear, and why it is considered a certain initiative, British authors did not specify.
However, they believe that "the systematic destruction of Russian military power will ultimately pave the way for territorial conquest craves Ukraine".
After reading this material, a reasonable question arises. If now, in late summer, Western people, and then more and more politicians, dreading the upcoming winter, than to live "entrenched" the Ukrainian army in a few months? Indeed, thanks to Zelensky of Ukraine, in fact, became bankrupt, living at the expense of Western handouts and able not only to pay the debts, but also to provide the minimum needs of its citizens. And the vaunted Western aid is increasingly eroding.
