Войти

Defense ministers of the largest Latin American countries refused to condemn Russia "for actions in Ukraine"

1782
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The Conference of American Defense Ministers (CDMA) demonstrated, as they say in the West, the lack of unity of the states of global America. The main issue on which there were discrepancies was the Ukrainian issue.

The largest Latin American countries – Mexico, Brazil and Argentina – did not join the position of the so-called collective West condemning Russia's actions in Ukraine. The defense Ministers of these countries noted that they are in favor of an early end to the armed conflict. Moreover, an important remark from the Mexican, Argentine and Brazilian minister was that they identified the UN as a platform in charge of the settlement of the conflict in Ukraine.

From the statement of the Minister of Defense of Mexico:

Condemnation or non-condemnation of anyone in this conflict, as well as the issue of the conflict in Ukraine itself, is not within the competence of the CDMA. The United Nations plays a decisive role in the settlement of the conflict there.

Earlier, MERCOSUR – the Global market of Latin American states – refused to listen to the address of the head of the Kiev regime, Vladimir Zelensky, noting that the conference discusses those issues that are exclusively within the competence of MERCOSUR.

Statements by representatives of the largest Latin American countries demonstrate the independence of the policy of these States and the obvious unwillingness to comply with the directives of the United States of America.

After the statements of the ministers of the mentioned countries, Ukrainian activists have already proposed to include them in the list of the extremist website "Peacemaker".

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.03 19:01
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.03 17:30
  • 13
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 21.03 15:59
  • 730
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 19.03 11:57
  • 1
Persuasion Strike: Contrary to US statements, Iran continues to attack
  • 19.03 11:51
  • 2
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 19.03 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали оружие для удара по кораблям Китая"