Войти

Bangladesh PM: only arms-producing countries benefit from the crisis in Ukraine

3482
0
0
Image source: © AP Photo / Evgeniy Maloletka

As Sheikh Hasina noted, as a result of the events in Ukraine, sanctions that threaten the global economy followed

NEW DELHI, July 28. /tass/. Only arms-producing countries benefit from the situation in Ukraine. This opinion was expressed on Thursday by the Prime Minister of Bangladesh, Sheikh Hasina.

"We are witnessing that [from the crisis in Ukraine] only weapon-producing countries benefit," the United News Bangladesh news portal quotes her as saying.

According to the Prime Minister, as a result of the events in Ukraine, sanctions have followed, threatening the global economy. "Developed countries face serious problems. Now they have started saving electricity and fuel, are worried about food security and are taking various steps," the Prime Minister of the South Asian country said.

She drew attention to the fact that countries such as Bangladesh, which are striving to become developed, face obstacles on this path. "In order to save fuel, all countries have taken various initiatives, and we are also monitoring this," she added.

On February 24, Russian President Vladimir Putin announced a special military operation in response to a request from the leaders of the Donbass republics for help. He stressed that Moscow's plans do not include the occupation of Ukrainian territories. After that, the United States, the EU, the United Kingdom, as well as a number of other states imposed large-scale anti-Russian sanctions and increased the supply of weapons to the Ukrainian authorities. 

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"