Войти

Experts in the United States on the destruction of the Russian Armed Forces of HIMARS installations: Previously, no one has been able to do this in the framework of hostilities

1902
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

American experts are skeptical about attempts by Ukrainian officials to refute the reports of the Russian Defense Ministry about the destruction of the HIMARS MLRS and a warehouse with Harpoon anti-ship missiles. Recall that one of the Ukrainian officials claimed that instead of a warehouse with "Harpoons", Russia was hitting a woodworking enterprise. Statements are being made in the US expert community regarding the fact that there may not be any contradictions if the AFU command decided to place the Harpoon PKR in the warehouse of a civilian industry facility.

Discussing the situation with the destruction of Haimars and Harpoon missiles, the American expert J.Buckby writes that "this is bad news for Ukraine and NATO." According to him, Russia has every opportunity to destroy these high-precision weapons from long distances with high accuracy.

Buckby:

Undoubtedly, this is a positive result.

After the footage published the other day with the destruction of the American HIMARS universal missile launcher, American military experts noted that no one had previously managed to destroy these MLRS within the framework of direct combat operations.

Recall that in the near future, Washington has planned to supply four more Hymars installations to Ukraine. However, in the West, further arming of Ukraine is increasingly causing skepticism, especially among military experts and ordinary citizens who are somehow interested in Ukrainian topics.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.03 11:21
  • 709
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 21.03 10:14
  • 4
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 21.03 05:00
  • 15044
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran
  • 19.03 11:57
  • 1
Persuasion Strike: Contrary to US statements, Iran continues to attack
  • 19.03 11:51
  • 2
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 19.03 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали оружие для удара по кораблям Китая"
  • 19.03 00:39
  • 0
Комментарий к "В США назвали Су-57 угрозой для F-35"