Войти

"The Suwalki corridor is a nightmare for NATO. And Russia does not need it at point blank range"

5103
1
-1
Image source: Kacper Pempel/Reuters

Why the corridor from Belarus to Kaliningrad scares the USA and Europe

The Suwalki corridor - a hypothetical land corridor of about 100 km, which could connect the territory of Belarus with the Kaliningrad region of Russia - has again become the focus of attention of Western media and politicians. In the United States and Europe, they believe that Moscow can seize this territory. What is the strategic importance of this corridor for NATO and for Russia - in the material of "Gazeta.Ru».

"Currently, in order to strengthen the Baltic states, NATO needs to pass through the Suwalki Corridor, a narrow land segment separating Kaliningrad and Belarus, which Russia may try to block in the event of a conflict. In this case, assistance to the Baltic states will no longer come, and Russia will nip in the bud any opportunity to block the Kaliningrad region," the editorial of the American newspaper The Washington Post notes.

The story about the corridor was also aired on the French TV channel France 24. On the air of the LRT TV channel, Lithuanian Defense Minister Arvydas Anushauskas said that "the Suwalki corridor remains a big problem for the security of the republic, and this problem is not being solved."

"The Americans call the Suwalki corridor the "Achilles heel" of NATO and the place where Russia can start a war with the alliance. The assumption, at first glance, is quite logical. After all, in the event of a blockade of the Russian Kaliningrad region, direct land communication with "mainland" Russia will be required. And this corridor, named after the Polish city of Suwalki located on it, is seen in NATO forecasts as a direct road for Russian troops to Kaliningrad," he told the newspaper.Ru" member of the Board of Military Experts Sergey Belousov.

Belarusian political scientist Alexander Zimovsky agrees with this point of view.

"The Suwalki corridor has been bothering NATO for a long time. Therefore, there is a constant build-up of the alliance's forces and means, namely, on the territory of Poland.

They are preparing them for offensive actions. In particular, to the forcing of water barriers. Such as the Western Bug and Svisloch borderlands for Poland and Belarus. For this purpose, parts of the American (66th Tank Regiment), French (7th Tank Brigade and 152nd Infantry Regiment), Swedish (Yeti Engineer Regiment) and Polish troops were concentrated in the Lomzha area. There are about 6 thousand military personnel in total.

In order to increase the effectiveness of the command and control of troops in this direction, the Pentagon has moved the directorate and headquarters of the 5th US Army Corps to Poland," Zimovsky said.

At the same time, he noted that the corridor is "extremely vulnerable." "He is shot through by artillery and multiple rocket launchers both from NATO and from the Belarusian and Russian territories," Zimovsky said.

Belousov, in turn, added that the topic of the Suwalki corridor is constantly raised not in Russia, but in NATO countries, especially in Poland and Lithuania, believing that this particular territory can become a point of aggravation of relations between Moscow and the North Atlantic Alliance, especially against the background of Finland and Sweden joining this organization.

Military expert, reserve Colonel Gennady Alekhine is sure that the Suvalkovsky corridor of Russia "is not too interesting and has no independent significance for Moscow."

"This is not the only route to Kaliningrad and maybe not the easiest. Its peculiarity lies in the fact that it passes through the territory of Belarus, where Russia has no formed military bases, the presence of large military formations, logistical means, ammunition stocks. If there really is a possibility of an armed conflict with NATO, it is easier to use the forces of the Western Military District, which are located on the border with Estonia or Latvia. This is their direction, both for the tank army and the same amphibious division in the Pskov region," Alyokhin believes.

It will be more difficult to break through Belarus to Kaliningrad precisely because of the lack of significant weapons on its territory, the expert stressed. It is easier in this case to go directly through the Baltic states.

"Such an option cannot be ruled out, and the Suwalki corridor can only become part of a certain general operation, which, for example, will contribute to taking the entire Baltic States in a pincer grip and entering the operational expanse in the direction of Poland.

I note that this is only a purely theoretical assumption! But just from the point of view of military theory, a corridor taken out of context alone is a terrible dream for NATO, and Russia does not need it point-blank.

The corridor is the only way for the alliance to help the Baltic States, but it is far from the only way for Russia to help Kaliningrad," Alyokhin summed up.


Victor Sokirko

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [1]
№1
10.06.2022 18:10
Цитата, q
Военный эксперт, полковник запаса Геннадий Алехин уверен, что Сувалковский коридор России «не слишком интересен и самостоятельного значения для Москвы не имеет».

Сувалковский коридор стратегически интересен в первую очередь для Белоруссии, как  прямой выход на Балтийское море через Калининградские порты.
Алёхин либо лукавит, либо не понимает какое важное значение для Калининградской области имеет сухопутное сообщение с Россией, пусть даже через территорию Белоруссии.

Потребовать его передачи от Польши к Белоруссии следует в обмен на присоединение к Польше Львовской области.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.12 13:04
  • 6571
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.12 12:29
  • 8544
Минобороны: Все авиаудары в Сирии пришлись по позициям боевиков
  • 22.12 10:58
  • 1
Еще немного в тему о танках (конечно, не без повторений :))
  • 22.12 07:45
  • 1
China has shown the launch of hypersonic drones from air carriers
  • 22.12 05:32
  • 58
Lessons from Syria
  • 22.12 03:15
  • 1
Немного о терминах.
  • 21.12 20:11
  • 2756
Как насчёт юмористического раздела?
  • 21.12 13:42
  • 1
Израиль нанес массированные авиаудары по Йемену
  • 21.12 13:02
  • 1
Путин заявил, что если бы и изменил решение о начале СВО в 2022 г., то в том, что его нужно было принимать раньше
  • 21.12 02:42
  • 1
Ответ на "Оружие, спровоцировавшее новую гонку ядерных вооружений, — в которой побеждает Россия (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 20.12 17:19
  • 1
РХБЗ: теория или практика
  • 20.12 16:07
  • 0
В системе стандартов серии ISO 55000 прошло масштабное обновление в 2024 году
  • 20.12 09:18
  • 0
Азиатский кейс Беларуси
  • 20.12 08:47
  • 0
Ответ на "В ЦРУ оценили легендарный Т-34. Как принципы производства советского танка влияют на СВО"
  • 20.12 05:07
  • 1
Israel forces new Syria to revive Arab military art