Войти

Head of the Council of the Zaporozhye Administration: The future of Zaporozhye is only within Russia

2133
0
+3

Image source: topwar.ru

The future of the regions liberated from the Kiev regime is being viewed. Earlier, the authorities of the Kherson region noted that they associate its future exclusively with Russia and that there is no question of existence in the format of an independent republic. A similar statement was made by the head of the Council of the CAA (military-civil administration) of the Zaporozhye region, Vladimir Rogov.

In an interview with the RIA Novosti information service, Vladimir Rogov noted that the Zaporozhye region can have only one future – as part of Russia, as a full-fledged subject of the federation.

Rogov added that there is no question of any Zaporozhye People's Republic – only as part of Russia, as it was earlier for centuries.

According to the head of the CAA Council of the Zaporozhye region, the region "was an advanced region of the Russian Empire":

The population of Zaporozhye has always been absolutely Russian in its mentality, which is why it will take a few months to fully adapt.

According to Rogov, the majority of Zaporozhets are in favor of Russia.

Recall that to date, such Zaporozhye cities as Melitopol, Berdyansk, Energodar, Primorsk, Tokmak, Rozovka and a number of others have been liberated from the troops of the Kiev regime. The total territories of the region, which are under the control of Russia, are about two-thirds in area. The flags of the Russian Federation are raised above them. Vladimir Rogov added that the regional center has not yet been liberated. According to him, everything is going to ensure that the city of Zaporozhye itself will be liberated from Ukrainian nationalists.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.08 06:28
  • 0
Комментарий к "Карл Маркс: философия, революции и геополитика — почему его идеи актуальны до сих пор"
  • 05.08 05:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "ПО СУЩЕСТВУ"
  • 05.08 02:36
  • 1
Ответ на вопрос "А стоит ли цитировать маршала Жукова"
  • 05.08 01:47
  • 0
Комментарий к "Рукопись о Баскервилях: деталь, после которой дело Холмса становится другим"
  • 05.08 01:04
  • 0
Комментарий к "Правда ли, что Россия проиграла Первую мировую из-за отсталости? Вся правда о главной военной лжи века"
  • 04.08 22:58
  • 0
Комментарий к "Медленное угасание "коалиции желающих" (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 04.08 20:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Закладка, определившая эпоху: день рождения двух морских легенд" и "Испытание океаном: история головного эсминца проекта 956, который дал имя серии"
  • 04.08 07:03
  • 1
Китайские ученые сделали ночное видение полноцветным
  • 04.08 04:51
  • 1
The slow decline of the "coalition of the willing" (The Telegraph UK, UK)
  • 04.08 04:40
  • 16353
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.08 01:30
  • 1
Комментарий к "Голодомор. Ложь и факты"
  • 04.08 01:09
  • 1
Комментарий к "Нравственный вакуум: Может ли атеизм обосновать добро? Христианство как опора человечности"
  • 04.08 00:17
  • 0
Комментарий к "Города-предатели, встречавшие немцев как освободителей"
  • 03.08 23:00
  • 1
Solidly built: how do mobile firing groups work on the Tigers
  • 03.08 22:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Красная Армия не смогла прорвать линию Маннергейма три месяца"