Войти

Beijing expressed "strong disagreement" with Biden's statement about readiness to use military force to protect Taiwan - Chinese Foreign Ministry

1900
0
0
Image source: © AP Photo / Wally Santana

Beijing. May 23. INTERFAX - Beijing criticized the words of US President Joe Biden about the US readiness to use military means to "protect Taiwan", pointed out that the Taiwan issue is an internal matter of the PRC.

"China expresses extreme dissatisfaction and resolute disagreement with this statement," Foreign Ministry spokesman Wang Wenbin said during a press briefing on Monday, his words are quoted by Asian media.

Ot noted that the Taiwan issue is exclusively an internal matter of the PRC, and Beijing is ready to take "decisive actions to protect its sovereignty and security interests."

In turn, the White House said that the United States adheres to the "one China" policy and is committed to preserving peace in the region.

"As the president said, our policy has not changed. He reaffirmed our one-China policy and commitment to peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait. He also reaffirmed our commitment to providing Taiwan with military means for self-defense in accordance with the "Law on Relations with Taiwan," CNN quoted an official from the White House as saying.

Earlier on Monday, Biden said that the US military would intervene in the event of an attack on Taiwan.

The Taiwan issue arose in 1949, when the Communist People's Republic of China was proclaimed, and part of the Kuomintang Party settled on the island of Taiwan. Beijing insists on the "one China principle", according to which both the PRC and the Republic of China on Taiwan cannot be recognized at the same time. At the same time, almost all major states have unofficial cultural and economic offices of Taipei.

Relations between Beijing and Taiwan improved significantly between 2008 and 2016, when the Kuomintang representative Ma Ying-jeou was the head of the Taiwanese administration. However, since Tsai Ing-wen became the head of the Taiwanese administration in 2016, Beijing has increased military pressure on Taiwan.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 20:46
Комментарий к "Танк Т-64 с автоматом заряжания убрал четвёртого члена экипажа — что это изменило в конструкции"
  • 01.08 19:13
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему гуманитарию так сложно найти общий язык с техническими специалистами? Я одна такая? Есть ли вообще решение?"
  • 01.08 18:25
  • 16349
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 01.08 06:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "Так какую же всё-таки роль сыграл Ленд-лиз"
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"