Войти

Washington Post: Russia's special military operation in Ukraine has led to disagreements in NATO

2041
1
0

Image source: topwar.ru

Hysterical demands for the buildup of NATO forces on the territory of the "main fighters" with Russia, i.e. Poland and the Baltic states, are beginning to irritate other members of the alliance. According to The Washington Post, NATO will not come to a consensus on Russia's special operation in Ukraine.

According to the American edition, there are more and more disagreements among NATO member countries regarding the consequences of the Russian special operation. If the countries of Western Europe, to some extent, treat what is happening in Ukraine more calmly and declare that Russia will not pose any threat to the alliance in the near future, then there is hysteria on the eastern flank of the military bloc. The main "fighters" against Russian aggression almost with one voice declare the danger "hanging" over NATO from Russia.

As already reported, Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia, as well as Poland, frightened by the Russian special operation in Ukraine, literally demand that Brussels deploy additional alliance forces on its territory on a permanent basis, including the deployment of missile defense systems. In their opinion, all this should stop the "potential Russian offensive." At the same time, a number of countries, in particular France and Spain, consider it too expensive and inconvenient. The thing is that neither the Balts nor the Poles pay for the presence of NATO military forces on their territory, they are supported by the alliance itself.

Meanwhile, this quartet of "fighters with Russia" (Poland + the Baltic States), came up with another initiative, calling on the alliance to officially sever relations with Russia and abandon the Founding Act on Mutual Relations, Cooperation and Security between the Russian Federation and NATO from 1997. The thing is that this document limits the number of NATO troops allowed to be permanently deployed on the territory of Eastern European countries. However, the United States and a number of countries from Western Europe disagree with this, stating that relations with Russia must be maintained.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Comments [1]
№1
23.05.2022 11:13
Возникает вопрос укрепит ли НАТО вступление финнов и шведов или как раз ослабит позиции  тех, кто за ужесточение политики НАТО в Европе?
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.07 12:41
  • 16321
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.07 06:07
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вот почему в танках СССР ставили автомат заряжания в корпус"
  • 22.07 03:50
  • 1
Индонезия захотела построить космодром совместно с Россией
  • 22.07 03:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ту-4: советская копия B-29"
  • 22.07 03:33
  • 1
Deceive flying: how Lightning drones learned to confuse the interceptors of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • 22.07 01:20
  • 1
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 22.07 00:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Станут ли европейцы воевать, если до этого дойдет? (The Economist, Великобритания)"
  • 21.07 22:40
  • 0
Комментарий к "США создали дешевый Patriot"
  • 21.07 20:17
  • 5
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 12:49
  • 1
Greetings to Odessa: Russia has begun to completely isolate Ukraine from the Black Sea
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"