Войти

American colonel: the United States will destroy Ukraine to spite Russia

2154
2
0
Image source: © AP Photo / Ukrainian Presidential Press Office via AP

The War for Globalism in Ukraine

The United States is waging a proxy war for globalism in Ukraine, writes American Colonel McGregor in an article for TAC. In his opinion, Washington is ready to do anything to harm Russia as much as possible in this conflict. Even if it means the destruction of Ukraine.

During the bombing of Yugoslavia in 1999, President Bill Clinton told the Americans: "That's the whole point of this story with Kosovo… This is globalism versus tribalism."

In 1999, Clinton's words passed by the ears of most Americans. In their view, Kosovo was another transatlantic conflict that had almost nothing to do with the daily life of America. And, frankly speaking, the word "tribalism" in the mouth of Clinton probably confused many. For most Americans, nationalism is loyalty to the motherland and a willingness to put the interests of the country above their own in a difficult moment of crisis or conflict. Tribal considerations are alien to American nationalists. They want to protect and protect the United States, their historical institutions and the rights enshrined in their laws, and not to unleash wars.

Since then, the term "globalism" has changed its meaning and means not just free trade and mutually beneficial relations between countries. Today, globalists condemn the Western nation-state and the nationalism inspired by it, seeing in them the focus of prejudice and the source of chauvinism and war. Looking back, we can say that Clinton's words about "globalism" fit perfectly into the Biden administration's proxy war with Russia.

For the current Washington elite, globalism is more than just importing goods from non–Western countries with a penny labor force. Globalism under the auspices of Washington promises the dissolution of the usual political and social forms of human organization – national governments, state borders, national identity, cultures. They will be replaced by a world of consumers united only by dependence on shapeless corporations, unaccountable non-governmental organizations and supranational institutions.

In other words, globalism today is synonymous with progressive left–wing views on the post-war liberal order of international security, which must constantly expand in order to survive. Washington's proxy war in Ukraine is a globalist plan in order to overcome the continuity of history, culture and geography embodied in the national state in order to depersonalize disparate peoples in the process of their adaptation to rapid social and technological changes. In this sense, the recent call of Ukrainian President Vladimir Zelensky to Washington and its strategic partners to establish global control over Russia's nuclear weapons echoes the progressive globalist thinking of the Biden administration.

That's the rub. Nations and their peoples do not develop in a vacuum and do not give up without a fight.

These moments should have alerted Washington, because its mediated war in Ukraine for globalism affects national consciousness – and this dynamic force stirs the deepest of human emotions. It is not just two nationalisms, Ukrainian and Russian, that are competing, which are rooted in language, culture and history. Washington globalism under the guise of NATO expansion openly challenges Russian national identity and culture. Russia's unique geographical role at the junction of European and Asian civilization, as well as its Orthodox culture – a system of beliefs anchored in the current state ideology, foreign policy and security policy, has been under attack.

After the US–led NATO military interventions in the Balkans, Afghanistan and Iraq, it is deeply hypocritical to pretend that NATO's invasion of Russia's western borders is harmless. But it is even more dangerous to ignore Moscow's opinion that NATO's encroachments on Ukraine are inextricably linked with the spread of globalism to Russia itself.

The statements of the US Secretary of Defense and the US Secretary of State that Washington wants to "weaken" Russia make it clear that Washington's "rules–based order" - supposedly benevolent – is not beneficial to Russia. These statements only confirm the Russians in the opinion that the United States is Ukraine's allies in the war for NATO expansion.

Even more revealing is the proposal that Poland, a daredevil in the ranks of NATO, should introduce "peacekeepers" to Ukraine. It is no secret to Europeans that Poland dominated most of Ukraine for almost four centuries, nor that Moldavia, formally Romanian, was a vassal of the Ottoman Empire for 300 years. From Washington's apparent readiness to introduce revanchist Polish forces into Western Ukraine – and, possibly, revanchist Romanian forces into Moldova – it follows that the globalists there will do anything to harm Russia, even to indulge the territorial ambitions of its historical enemies.

Any war for the leaders of warring states is a test of legitimacy, and for their peoples – for strength. And this applies to both the Biden administration and the Zelensky and Putin governments. Unable to cope with the financial crisis, the deficit and the increase in crime in America and demonstrating deliberate ignorance about Eastern Europe and its peoples, President Biden and his supporters on Capitol Hill are brewing a mess that will bring dangerous consequences to Washington and its NATO partners. As Sigmund Freud wrote about Biden's forerunner, the "internationalist" Woodrow Wilson, "he has a wonderful ability to ignore facts and believe in what he wants." However, it is much more difficult to throw dust in the eyes of Americans now than in 1917.

Washington has fueled Ukraine's war with Russia for many years by putting Ukrainian nationalism at its service – although globalists generally hate this incendiary force. It worked. Now the same globalists are dragging out the conflict – with weapons, advice and other incentives, although they are destroying Ukraine.

Over the past 30 years, Washington's emphasis on arms supplies, military intervention and the change of undesirable regimes has drawn the United States into conflicts and crises in the Balkans and the Middle East, the Maghreb and Southwest Asia. American nationalists are not responsible for the current conflict in Ukraine, nor for the doomed wars of the last three decades. But now American nationalists are needed more than ever to stop the globalist war for the destruction of Russia before it spreads like a cancer throughout Eastern Europe.

Douglas MacGregor

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
Original publication
InoSMI materials contain ratings exclusively from foreign media and do not reflect the editorial board's position ВПК.name
  • The news mentions
Comments [2]
№1
06.05.2022 16:47
Американцы в лёгкую купили Зеленского, который шёл на выборы с противоположными тезисами, обещая мир и суд над Порошенко. Вопрос в том, был ли у нас шанс изменить ситуацию? Суд над Порошенко - это фактически денацификация, а это было бы не совместимо с требованиями НАТО. Интересно сколько бы запросил Зеленский за реализацию обещаний? Американцы дали ему порядка 500 млн баксов, как понимаю, но зато это намного меньше 5 млрд, которые были вложены ими в Антироссию раньше. Нашим было трудно конкурировать как в плане денег, так и в плане пропаганды, хотя сам факт победы Зеленского с теми тезисами говорил о том, что тогда народ ещё не был оболванен до такой степени как сейчас... Мы сознательно пошли на конфликт, чтобы рестартануть Украину? Нам надо было выиграть время, чтобы перевооружить армию, но похоже не удалось правильно учесть "качество" укропропаганды, обеспеченное американцами - народ кардинально оболванился за эти годы.
0
Inform
№2
07.05.2022 20:05
Цитата
Американский полковник: США уничтожат Украину назло России
Нет худа без добра. На уничтоженной Украине России потом и не придётся особо что-то строить, восстанавливать, вкладывать деньги (как в Крым, только гораздо масштабней) - многие жители сами сбегут либо на Запад, либо в Россию и будут там работать, ну а на Украине будет аграрная местность, благо чернозёмы есть и климат подходящий, а для аграрной местности не нужно много строить.
0
Inform
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 20.09 13:44
  • 4
Названы сроки поставки первых самолётов ЛМС-901 «Байкал», разработанных для замены Ан-2 «Кукурузник»
  • 20.09 12:51
  • 1
Russia has increased the production of highly demanded weapons, Putin said
  • 20.09 12:17
  • 1
Moscow owes Beijing a debt as part of the anti-Western axis, says the head of NATO (The Times, UK)
  • 20.09 11:23
  • 4833
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.09 10:58
  • 5
Путин: опыт СВО всесторонне изучают в КБ и НИИ для повышения боевой мощи армии
  • 20.09 06:27
  • 1
Electronic interference and a "furrow" between the clouds: a Spanish columnist drew attention to the "oddities" in the flight of the F-35 fighter
  • 19.09 22:25
  • 1
ВВС Бразилии рассматривают индийский LCA "Теджас" в качестве кандидата на замену парка F-5 "Тайгер-2"
  • 19.09 22:15
  • 594
Израиль "готовился не к той войне" — и оказался уязвим перед ХАМАС
  • 19.09 16:10
  • 1
Космонавт Кононенко подвел итоги пятой в карьере экспедиции
  • 19.09 15:45
  • 0
Нападение на Беларусь станет началом третьей мировой войны. Видео
  • 19.09 15:24
  • 0
Стальные войска – в авангарде страны!
  • 19.09 11:42
  • 1
The Polish tank division in Ukraine. The United States has come up with a plan on how to negotiate with Russia (Forsal, Poland)
  • 19.09 06:58
  • 1
НАТО планирует создание нового центра управления воздушными операциями для контроля Арктики
  • 19.09 06:47
  • 1
Индия закупит сотни двигателей для Су-30МКИ
  • 19.09 06:32
  • 1
Путин: ВС РФ нужны высококвалифицированные военные для работы с новыми вооружениями