Войти

The expert called the accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO realistic

1522
0
0
Image source: © РИА Новости / Стрингер

MOSCOW, April 29 - RIA Novosti. The accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO is very realistic, but even without joining the alliance, they can deploy NATO bases and military contingents on their territory, Doctor of Political Sciences, associate Professor of the Department of International Security at the Faculty of World Politics of Lomonosov Moscow State University Alexey Fenenko told RIA Novosti.

US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken said on Thursday that the United States expects a decision by Sweden and Finland on possible NATO membership before the upcoming alliance summit in Madrid in June. The head of American diplomacy stressed that if Finland and Sweden make a choice in favor of joining the alliance, the United States will strongly support their applications.

"It's very realistic. The relevant agreements on the expanded partnership of Sweden and Finland with NATO were prepared back in 2014. True, they were not signed then, but nothing prevents them from returning to this format. So even without joining NATO, there is already a legal basis for the deployment of NATO bases and military contingents on their territory," Fenenko said.

He added that the neutrality of these two countries was actually revised back in 1995. "Their entry into the European Union already meant, in fact, abandoning the policy of neutrality, since the European Union has a common security and defense policy. Therefore, even now they can only be spoken of as conditionally neutral countries," the expert explained.

Finland and Sweden have started talking about the possibility of abandoning long-term neutrality and joining NATO against the background of the Russian military operation in Ukraine. The head of the alliance, Jens Stoltenberg, noted that the alliance would be glad to see Finland and Sweden in its ranks and provide them with the opportunity to join quickly. NATO expects these countries to make independent decisions on possible membership in the alliance in the coming "months and weeks," said the permanent representative of the United States to NATO, Julianne Smith. She added that the United States would welcome the accession of these countries to the alliance.

Russia has repeatedly noted that NATO is aimed at confrontation. The press secretary of the President of the Russian Federation Dmitry Peskov stated that the further expansion of the alliance will not bring greater security to Europe, NATO has an aggressive character. At the same time, he noted that he does not consider the possible accession of Sweden and Finland to NATO an existential threat to Russia.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.07 12:41
  • 16321
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.07 06:07
  • 0
Комментарий к "Вот почему в танках СССР ставили автомат заряжания в корпус"
  • 22.07 03:50
  • 1
Индонезия захотела построить космодром совместно с Россией
  • 22.07 03:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ту-4: советская копия B-29"
  • 22.07 03:33
  • 1
Deceive flying: how Lightning drones learned to confuse the interceptors of the Armed Forces of Ukraine
  • 22.07 01:20
  • 1
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 22.07 00:02
  • 0
Комментарий к "Станут ли европейцы воевать, если до этого дойдет? (The Economist, Великобритания)"
  • 21.07 22:40
  • 0
Комментарий к "США создали дешевый Patriot"
  • 21.07 20:17
  • 5
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 12:49
  • 1
Greetings to Odessa: Russia has begun to completely isolate Ukraine from the Black Sea
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"