Войти

Borrel: "This war must be won on the battlefield"

1644
0
0

Image source: topwar.ru

The head of European diplomacy, Josep Borrel, made a post on a social network after his visit to Kiev, which attracts special attention. Recall that Borrel made a visit to Ukraine as part of the EU delegation, which included the head of the European Commission Ursula von der Leyen.

Borrel made a statement in which he wished the Russian-Ukrainian conflict to end not by political, but by military means. At the same time, Borrel recalled that about half a billion euros are allocated to Ukraine for military assistance, primarily for the purchase of NATO weapons.

From the record of the head of the diplomatic department of the European Union:

This war must be won on the battlefield.

Apart from the fact that we are not talking about war, but about a military special operation, then it is really difficult to disagree with Borrel. Indeed, this conflict, in fact, with all Europe united in support of the Bandera ideology, must be won on the battlefield. Win Russia. Without any options.

That's just one thing Borrel admits inaccuracy. The Ukrainian regime is fighting mainly not on the battlefield, but from apartments, private houses, schools, kindergartens, hospitals and theaters. Firing positions are being equipped there, heavy equipment is placed near these buildings, nationalist battalion fighters are operating there, turning the civilian population of Ukraine into a human shield.

During his meeting with Zelensky Borrel promised the head of the Kiev regime new sanctions against Russia. Interestingly, after that he drained gasoline from the tank of the car on which he moved around the Kiev region as a sign of full support for anti-Russian sanctions?..

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"