Войти

"It is pointless to use a grenade launcher in the fight against Daggers and Iskanders

3417
0
+2
Image source: Gleb Garanich/Reuters

Experts explained why London supplies NLAW complexes to Kiev

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson promised to transfer another 6,000 NLAW complexes to Kiev. Before that, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed videos where Russian servicemen received complexes as trophies. "Newspaper.Ru" figured out for what purpose NLAW is being transported to Ukraine.

Boris Johnson believes that additional lethal defensive weapons will help Ukrainians "continue to defend themselves." In addition, London is discussing the possibility of transferring Starstreak portable anti-aircraft missile systems (MANPADS) to Kiev, which may also fall under the definition of "defensive weapons".

NLAW (Next Generation Light Anti-tank Weapon, Lightweight anti-tank weapon of the next generation) is a joint Swedish-British development. It has been produced since 2009, the caliber is 150 mm, the maximum range is 800 meters.

"This is a cross between a conventional grenade launcher and a real anti-tank missile system (ATGM). Classic ATGMs are very expensive. The same Javelin costs, judging by open sources, up to $ 250 thousand. It is effective, but too expensive. NLAW costs significantly less. About $30 thousand. In fact, it is the same grenade launcher, but equipped with a slightly more "smart" sight. It calculates the range and angular velocity for attacking the target, automatically makes all the necessary corrections. This is better than a simple hand-held anti-tank grenade launcher (RPG). But it cannot, unlike ATGMS, accompany a moving target. Plus, it is not so effective against dynamic protection," he told the newspaper.Ru" member of the Board of Military Experts Sergey Belousov.

According to Alexey Leonkov, editor of the Arsenal of the Fatherland magazine, NLAW has limitations that do not allow it to be used effectively "if the fighter is not a master of using this grenade launcher."

"It is not enough to own a grenade launcher, you need to understand where it will be most effective for use on heavily and lightly armored vehicles. Ukrainian servicemen have been trained in the use of NLAW since 2018, but this training, apparently, was not entirely effective. It is not the weapon that matters, but the one who owns it," he told the newspaper.En" Leonkov.

He also noted that the main damaging effect of NLAW is the cumulative jet, which should burn through the armor of the tank.

According to military expert Viktor Litovkin, NLAW is "useless for the APU." "The Russian army is conducting an operation not only with tanks and other armored vehicles, but also with Iskander missiles, Calibres, Daggers. In the fight against these striking means, the specified supplied weapons are simply meaningless," the expert believes.

Litovkin believes that supplies to Ukraine are a way for the UK to get rid of its old or ineffective weapons. Sergey Belousov agrees with him.

"NLAW, unlike Javelin and Stinger, does not have some kind of grandiose reputation. There was almost no talk about its effective use in recent conflicts. Neither in Syria, nor in Libya, nor in other places. This is not a very effective and budget-friendly weapon. That's why he is being sent to Ukraine. At the same time, we do not know the financial aspects of these deliveries. NLAW is produced by the defense division of SAAB - this is Bofors Dynamics.

Does London buy NLAW from the company or give it away from its army depots? In both cases, the weapons are most likely bought by a private contractor paid by the government. This is what the US did when it supplied weapons to Afghanistan. They did this through the firms Sierra Four Industries, Orbital ATK, Global Ordnance and UDC. As a result, the contractor received money, and the government got rid of old weapons and equipment and could order new ones. Everyone is happy",

Belousov concluded.


Irina Alshayeva

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 12.06 13:08
  • 16071
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 12.06 11:57
  • 128
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 12.06 09:15
  • 15
Модернизированный Ка-52М получит новый радар с АФАР
  • 12.06 08:10
  • 1
Делегация РФ: главными спонсорами убийства россиян стали члены "коалиции дронов"
  • 12.06 02:14
  • 0
Комментарий к "Появились кадры новой модификации истребителя с наибольшей в мире дальностью полета: каковы улучшения Су-34? (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 12.06 00:46
  • 0
Комментарий к "Перечислено вооружение «телохранителя» российских Су-34"
  • 11.06 18:57
  • 2
About 64 hours of new MC-21-310 flights and the workload of aircraft factories in Irkutsk and Komsomolsk-on-Amur
  • 11.06 13:56
  • 33
Российский сверхзвуковой пассажирский самолет — преемник Ту-144 — будет летать со скоростью 2500 км/ч на расстояние свыше 8500 км
  • 11.06 12:17
  • 1
During the conflict between Russia and Ukraine, drones invade neighboring countries (The New York Times, USA)
  • 11.06 10:46
  • 1
Украина автоматизировала перехват российских «Гераней»
  • 11.06 09:09
  • 1
The single Euro destroyer collapsed before takeoff
  • 11.06 06:36
  • 0
Комментарий к "Новые истребители Су-30СМ2 ВМФ России возглавили учения Балтийского флота по имитации атак на цели НАТО (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 11.06 05:29
  • 0
Комментарии к "ОСК представила на МВМС "ФЛОТ-2026" проект НАПЛ "Амур 1650" с ВПУ и ВНЭУ" и "В России представили подлодку «Амур-1650»"
  • 11.06 00:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Ростех» рассказал об универсальности «Панциря-МЕ»"
  • 10.06 13:37
  • 2
The "shock" turbine: how one detail blocked the gas valve to the West