Войти

"It is pointless to use a grenade launcher in the fight against Daggers and Iskanders

2888
0
+2
Image source: Gleb Garanich/Reuters

Experts explained why London supplies NLAW complexes to Kiev

British Prime Minister Boris Johnson promised to transfer another 6,000 NLAW complexes to Kiev. Before that, the Ministry of Defense of the Russian Federation showed videos where Russian servicemen received complexes as trophies. "Newspaper.Ru" figured out for what purpose NLAW is being transported to Ukraine.

Boris Johnson believes that additional lethal defensive weapons will help Ukrainians "continue to defend themselves." In addition, London is discussing the possibility of transferring Starstreak portable anti-aircraft missile systems (MANPADS) to Kiev, which may also fall under the definition of "defensive weapons".

NLAW (Next Generation Light Anti-tank Weapon, Lightweight anti-tank weapon of the next generation) is a joint Swedish-British development. It has been produced since 2009, the caliber is 150 mm, the maximum range is 800 meters.

"This is a cross between a conventional grenade launcher and a real anti-tank missile system (ATGM). Classic ATGMs are very expensive. The same Javelin costs, judging by open sources, up to $ 250 thousand. It is effective, but too expensive. NLAW costs significantly less. About $30 thousand. In fact, it is the same grenade launcher, but equipped with a slightly more "smart" sight. It calculates the range and angular velocity for attacking the target, automatically makes all the necessary corrections. This is better than a simple hand-held anti-tank grenade launcher (RPG). But it cannot, unlike ATGMS, accompany a moving target. Plus, it is not so effective against dynamic protection," he told the newspaper.Ru" member of the Board of Military Experts Sergey Belousov.

According to Alexey Leonkov, editor of the Arsenal of the Fatherland magazine, NLAW has limitations that do not allow it to be used effectively "if the fighter is not a master of using this grenade launcher."

"It is not enough to own a grenade launcher, you need to understand where it will be most effective for use on heavily and lightly armored vehicles. Ukrainian servicemen have been trained in the use of NLAW since 2018, but this training, apparently, was not entirely effective. It is not the weapon that matters, but the one who owns it," he told the newspaper.En" Leonkov.

He also noted that the main damaging effect of NLAW is the cumulative jet, which should burn through the armor of the tank.

According to military expert Viktor Litovkin, NLAW is "useless for the APU." "The Russian army is conducting an operation not only with tanks and other armored vehicles, but also with Iskander missiles, Calibres, Daggers. In the fight against these striking means, the specified supplied weapons are simply meaningless," the expert believes.

Litovkin believes that supplies to Ukraine are a way for the UK to get rid of its old or ineffective weapons. Sergey Belousov agrees with him.

"NLAW, unlike Javelin and Stinger, does not have some kind of grandiose reputation. There was almost no talk about its effective use in recent conflicts. Neither in Syria, nor in Libya, nor in other places. This is not a very effective and budget-friendly weapon. That's why he is being sent to Ukraine. At the same time, we do not know the financial aspects of these deliveries. NLAW is produced by the defense division of SAAB - this is Bofors Dynamics.

Does London buy NLAW from the company or give it away from its army depots? In both cases, the weapons are most likely bought by a private contractor paid by the government. This is what the US did when it supplied weapons to Afghanistan. They did this through the firms Sierra Four Industries, Orbital ATK, Global Ordnance and UDC. As a result, the contractor received money, and the government got rid of old weapons and equipment and could order new ones. Everyone is happy",

Belousov concluded.


Irina Alshayeva

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.11 21:21
  • 5829
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 22.11 20:23
  • 0
В рамках "корабельной полемики".
  • 22.11 16:34
  • 1
Степанов: Канада забыла о своем суверенитете, одобрив передачу США Украине мин
  • 22.11 16:14
  • 11
  • 22.11 12:43
  • 7
Стало известно о выгоде США от модернизации мощнейшего корабля ВМФ России
  • 22.11 04:04
  • 684
Израиль "готовился не к той войне" — и оказался уязвим перед ХАМАС
  • 22.11 03:10
  • 2
ВСУ получили от США усовершенствованные противорадиолокационные ракеты AGM-88E (AARGM) для ударов по российским средствам ПВО
  • 22.11 02:28
  • 1
Путин сообщил о нанесении комбинированного удара ВС РФ по ОПК Украины
  • 21.11 20:03
  • 1
Аналитик Коротченко считает, что предупреждения об ответном ударе РФ не будет
  • 21.11 16:16
  • 136
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 21.11 13:19
  • 16
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 21.11 13:14
  • 39
Какое оружие может оказаться эффективным против боевых беспилотников
  • 21.11 12:14
  • 0
Один – за всех и все – за одного!
  • 21.11 12:12
  • 0
Моделирование боевых действий – основа системы поддержки принятия решений
  • 21.11 11:52
  • 11
Why the Patriot air defense systems transferred to Ukraine are by no means an easy target for the Russian Aerospace Forces