Войти

Russia will continue to seek from NATO and the United States a response to the key provisions of the initiative on security guarantees - Putin

1878
0
+2
Image source: © REUTERS / DADO RUVIC

Moscow. February 8. INTERFAX - Moscow will continue to seek from NATO and the United States a response to the key provisions of its initiative on security guarantees, there are things in the responses from Washington and Brussels that can be discussed, but they are of a secondary nature, Russian President Vladimir Putin said.

"We will now prepare a response to the paper we received from Brussels and Washington, we will send it to Washington and Brussels," he said at a press conference following talks with French President Emmanuel Macron.

According to Putin, "there really are things that can be discussed, true, they are of a secondary nature, but nevertheless."

"We will, of course, seek answers to key questions," the Russian president stressed.

"I will not open every article, but on all key issues: NATO non-proliferation, the non-deployment of strike systems near our borders, the return of NATO infrastructure to 1997," there is not just no position on any of these points, and even the answer is "no" or "yes". It seems that we didn't even raise these questions. They were simply bypassed," he continued.

"We see political cliches and proposals on some minor issues there. I don't think that our dialogue is over," Putin said.

He also called the unwillingness of the United States and NATO to make public their responses to Russian proposals strange.

"If we have sent openly (proposals - IF), then what should we hide from the public of our countries, what they have answered us," the Russian president wondered.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"