Войти

The US believes that they did not surprise Russia with the reaction to its security proposals - State Department

2061
0
0
Image source: © AP Photo / Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Washington. 1st of February. INTERFAX - The reaction of the United States to Russia's security proposals did not come as a surprise to Moscow, otherwise Washington is ready for diplomatic cooperation, US State Department spokesman Ned Price said on Tuesday.

"I think it was not a surprise for the Russian Federation or for anyone else that we stated in the response (to the Russian Federation's proposals on security - IF), since we made it very clear," Price said during a briefing.

He added that there are areas in which Washington, its allies and partners are ready to interact with Russia and conduct constructive discussions.

"There are areas where we will state our security concerns, Russia will state what concerns it, and we will see if there is an opportunity to resolve this," Price said.

"If we want this, we need intensive, constructive, serious, sustainable diplomacy. We are ready for this," the representative of the State Department stressed.

In turn, White House press Secretary Jen Psaki also said that the door to diplomacy with Moscow is still open.

"We are ready (for further contacts - IF). The door of diplomacy remains open," Psaki said.

She once again reminded that US President Joe Biden, if necessary, would be ready to hold another conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Earlier, Price said that the United States had made it clear to Russia that it would not allow attempts to achieve a change in NATO's "open door" policy and Washington's cooperation with other sovereign countries.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"