Войти

The US believes that they did not surprise Russia with the reaction to its security proposals - State Department

2477
0
0
Image source: © AP Photo / Pablo Martinez Monsivais

Washington. 1st of February. INTERFAX - The reaction of the United States to Russia's security proposals did not come as a surprise to Moscow, otherwise Washington is ready for diplomatic cooperation, US State Department spokesman Ned Price said on Tuesday.

"I think it was not a surprise for the Russian Federation or for anyone else that we stated in the response (to the Russian Federation's proposals on security - IF), since we made it very clear," Price said during a briefing.

He added that there are areas in which Washington, its allies and partners are ready to interact with Russia and conduct constructive discussions.

"There are areas where we will state our security concerns, Russia will state what concerns it, and we will see if there is an opportunity to resolve this," Price said.

"If we want this, we need intensive, constructive, serious, sustainable diplomacy. We are ready for this," the representative of the State Department stressed.

In turn, White House press Secretary Jen Psaki also said that the door to diplomacy with Moscow is still open.

"We are ready (for further contacts - IF). The door of diplomacy remains open," Psaki said.

She once again reminded that US President Joe Biden, if necessary, would be ready to hold another conversation with Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Earlier, Price said that the United States had made it clear to Russia that it would not allow attempts to achieve a change in NATO's "open door" policy and Washington's cooperation with other sovereign countries.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Проекты
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 15.10 01:30
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ядерный «Пионер». Каким был предок «Орешника», который пугал Европу 40 лет назад"
  • 15.10 00:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Ствол как рудимент: почему артиллерия теряет смысл"
  • 14.10 23:11
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Не большевики погубили Россию»: историк Спицын раскрыл, почему Российская империя была обречена задолго до 1917 года"
  • 14.10 19:14
  • 1
Комментарий к "Дискуссия после речи генерала Гринкевича на Варшавском форуме по безопасности (The Guardian, Великобритания)"
  • 14.10 15:35
  • 1
Ту-214 сократят экипаж
  • 14.10 09:38
  • 1
Discussion after General Grinkevich's speech at the Warsaw Security Forum (The Guardian, UK)
  • 14.10 07:46
  • 0
Комментарий к "О революции большевиков, танках и любви к Родине"
  • 14.10 01:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Первый блок транспортного дока "Амур" вывели из цеха"
  • 14.10 00:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Три признака отступления Америки (The Hill, США)"
  • 13.10 23:49
  • 0
Комментарий к "Танк Т-14 "Армата" сравнили с Ferrari - чем он лучше суперкара"
  • 13.10 22:52
  • 0
Комментарий к "В НАТО заявили, что намеренно скрывают суть последствий применения 5-й статьи"
  • 13.10 21:42
  • 1
Trump helps Putin in economic confrontation with Ukraine (The New York Times, USA)
  • 13.10 17:28
  • 2
Самый мощный в мире пулемет КПВТ для борьбы с дронами получил "Кречет"
  • 13.10 13:44
  • 1
Compactness and accuracy: Why fighters praise the SIDS sniper rifle
  • 13.10 13:20
  • 3
Комментарий к "Объект 292: Т-80 с огромной 152-мм пушкой. Зачем СССР поставил на танк орудие почти от самоходки"