Войти

Medvedev: Ukraine's non-entry into NATO will not remove the threats emanating from its territory

3105
0
-1
Image source: © РИА Новости / Юлия Власова

The United States can supply Kiev with strike weapons on a bilateral basis, he said

Slides. January 27. INTERFAX - Moscow understands perfectly well that NATO's guaranteed refusal to move further to the borders of the Russian Federation will not ensure Russia's security, since Ukraine, for example, can receive shock weapons on a bilateral basis from the United States, said Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev.

In an interview with a number of Russian media, including Interfax, he stressed that security guarantees for Russia should be more comprehensive than guarantees from further expansion of the North Atlantic Alliance.

"It's not even about, for example, guaranteeing against non-promotion of NATO, although this is very important. And the point is that security guarantees are given, in my opinion, of a different order," Medvedev stressed.

He explained: "It is possible not to invite Ukraine to NATO at all. Moreover, they periodically whisper in our ear that Ukraine will not join NATO in the coming years at all."

According to the deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, this is not the question: "It is possible, on the basis of bilateral agreements, to put the same types of shock weapons, the same missiles, on the territory of Ukraine or any other country and say: "No, no, we are not NATO, this is, for example, an agreement between the United States and Ukraine, Great Britain and Ukraine, so it has nothing to do with NATO."

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 03.07 15:17
  • 60
Improved ZSU-23-4M4 Shilka can also fight Tomahawk missiles
  • 03.07 01:42
  • 1
В США рассказали о новой роли Су-57
  • 03.07 01:32
  • 1
FT: Европа хочет использовать оборонный потенциал Турции на фоне разлада с США
  • 02.07 15:09
  • 16223
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 02.07 12:08
  • 4
Why does Russia need a new tank school in the UAV era
  • 02.07 05:07
  • 1
Появились данные о подготовке НАТО массированного прорыва российской ПВО
  • 01.07 19:23
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Политический вопрос»: почему Турция хочет продать российские С-400 Южной Корее?"
  • 01.07 07:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "Украина как краеугольный камень новой европейской стратегии (The National Interest, США)"
  • 01.07 05:08
  • 1
Новейший украинский ЗРК «Риф» разместили на шасси советского ЗРК «Стрела-10»
  • 01.07 02:50
  • 1
"Political question": why does Turkey want to sell the Russian S-400 to South Korea?
  • 01.07 02:31
  • 1
Ukraine as the cornerstone of a new European strategy (The National Interest, USA)
  • 01.07 00:22
  • 2
Комментарий к "В России предложен новый способ борьбы с авианосцами США"
  • 30.06 23:56
  • 1
Британия отказалась от новых эсминцев в пользу гибридных кораблей с БЛА
  • 30.06 23:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "НАТО под давлением, Европе предстоит крупнейшее перевооружение в истории (El Pais, Испания)"
  • 30.06 22:57
  • 1
В США оценили воздушный компонент ядерной триады России