Войти

Medvedev: Ukraine's non-entry into NATO will not remove the threats emanating from its territory

3137
0
-1
Image source: © РИА Новости / Юлия Власова

The United States can supply Kiev with strike weapons on a bilateral basis, he said

Slides. January 27. INTERFAX - Moscow understands perfectly well that NATO's guaranteed refusal to move further to the borders of the Russian Federation will not ensure Russia's security, since Ukraine, for example, can receive shock weapons on a bilateral basis from the United States, said Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev.

In an interview with a number of Russian media, including Interfax, he stressed that security guarantees for Russia should be more comprehensive than guarantees from further expansion of the North Atlantic Alliance.

"It's not even about, for example, guaranteeing against non-promotion of NATO, although this is very important. And the point is that security guarantees are given, in my opinion, of a different order," Medvedev stressed.

He explained: "It is possible not to invite Ukraine to NATO at all. Moreover, they periodically whisper in our ear that Ukraine will not join NATO in the coming years at all."

According to the deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, this is not the question: "It is possible, on the basis of bilateral agreements, to put the same types of shock weapons, the same missiles, on the territory of Ukraine or any other country and say: "No, no, we are not NATO, this is, for example, an agreement between the United States and Ukraine, Great Britain and Ukraine, so it has nothing to do with NATO."

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 21.07 20:17
  • 5
Комментарий к "Жуткий схематизм в теории прибавочной стоимости Маркса и ее научная несостоятельность."
  • 21.07 18:44
  • 16316
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.07 12:49
  • 1
Greetings to Odessa: Russia has begun to completely isolate Ukraine from the Black Sea
  • 21.07 05:46
  • 8
Пентагон впервые за 20 лет скрыл отчет о недостатках истребителей F-35
  • 21.07 03:48
  • 1
Российские порты прикрыли «Корветом»
  • 21.07 03:43
  • 1
США создали дешевый Patriot
  • 21.07 03:35
  • 1
Will the Europeans fight if it comes to that? (The Economist, UK)
  • 20.07 18:15
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: Challenger 2 или Т-72. Сравнительный обзор (Часть 3)"
  • 20.07 15:47
  • 1
An unmanned project
  • 20.07 12:23
  • 198
Russia has launched production of 20 Tu-214 aircraft
  • 20.07 06:19
  • 0
Комментарий к "Какой танк лучше: M1 Abrams или Т-90. Сравнительный обзор"
  • 20.07 05:26
  • 0
По поводу ОЧЕНЬ интересной темы - сравнения танков.
  • 19.07 19:21
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Первую Мировую войну «забыли»?"
  • 19.07 03:37
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия избежать участия в Первой Мировой?"
  • 19.07 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Лучше быть голодными, чем русскими»: Шахназаров узнал от латыша, почему Латвия так относится к России"