Войти

Medvedev: Ukraine's non-entry into NATO will not remove the threats emanating from its territory

3063
0
-1
Image source: © РИА Новости / Юлия Власова

The United States can supply Kiev with strike weapons on a bilateral basis, he said

Slides. January 27. INTERFAX - Moscow understands perfectly well that NATO's guaranteed refusal to move further to the borders of the Russian Federation will not ensure Russia's security, since Ukraine, for example, can receive shock weapons on a bilateral basis from the United States, said Deputy Chairman of the Russian Security Council Dmitry Medvedev.

In an interview with a number of Russian media, including Interfax, he stressed that security guarantees for Russia should be more comprehensive than guarantees from further expansion of the North Atlantic Alliance.

"It's not even about, for example, guaranteeing against non-promotion of NATO, although this is very important. And the point is that security guarantees are given, in my opinion, of a different order," Medvedev stressed.

He explained: "It is possible not to invite Ukraine to NATO at all. Moreover, they periodically whisper in our ear that Ukraine will not join NATO in the coming years at all."

According to the deputy chairman of the Security Council of the Russian Federation, this is not the question: "It is possible, on the basis of bilateral agreements, to put the same types of shock weapons, the same missiles, on the territory of Ukraine or any other country and say: "No, no, we are not NATO, this is, for example, an agreement between the United States and Ukraine, Great Britain and Ukraine, so it has nothing to do with NATO."

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 09.06 06:48
  • 2
В России предложили создать малую систему ПВО
  • 09.06 06:10
  • 0
Комментарий к "Крушитель авианосцев: какой флагман получит Северный флот"
  • 09.06 04:59
  • 0
Комментарий к "На границе НАТО с Россией я увидел разгром бронетанковых войск (The Telegraph UK, Великобритания)"
  • 09.06 02:32
  • 0
Комментарий к ""Три условия, и победа над Россией у нас в кармане". У Расмуссена есть план (The Economist, Великобритания)"
  • 09.06 01:36
  • 1
NATO defeats the enemy imitating Russia's actions by a small margin in the framework of cyber training (Financial Times, UK)
  • 09.06 01:20
  • 1
Rostec reported that the Russian fifth-generation fighter Su-57 is capable of performing the functions of an air command post (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 09.06 01:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "Помощник президента России подтвердил наличие непубличных контактов с Киевом"
  • 09.06 00:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Наступившее лето отличается от предыдущих аналогичных периодов СВО"
  • 08.06 21:33
  • 2
FPV-дрон "Пиранья 10", сбивший танк ABRAMS, показали на HeliRussia-2026
  • 08.06 20:00
  • 0
Комментарий к "Крупнейшая в мире ударная подлодка заявила о своем присутствии близ заполярных рубежей НАТО. Насколько могуч "Ясень-М"? (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 08.06 12:03
  • 16032
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 08.06 11:40
  • 8
На Западе оценили ракетную мощь российского «Адмирала Нахимова»
  • 08.06 10:27
  • 2
Дуров: Чиновнику, «сломавшему интернет» в РФ, американцы должны вручить медаль
  • 08.06 08:34
  • 1
Every Russian soldier will be included in a single information network
  • 08.06 08:26
  • 0
Комментарий к "На Западе рассказали о значении «Форта-М» на «Адмирале Нахимове»"