Войти

German Chancellor declined an invitation to meet with Biden to discuss Ukraine - Mass media

1813
0
0
Image source: block-chain24.com

London. January 21. INTERFAX - German Chancellor Olaf Scholz refused a personal meeting with US President Joe Biden to discuss the situation around Ukraine, The Telegraph reports.

According to the publication, Scholz declined an invitation from the White House to fly to Washington last week. As a justification, he allegedly told Biden that he had other responsibilities.

As noted, in this regard, the White House sent US Secretary of State Anthony Blinken to Berlin in order to convey to the German Chancellor that he should support the introduction of serious sanctions if Berlin is not going to supply weapons to Ukraine.

The Telegraph writes that by refusing to meet with the US president, Scholz contributed to the intensification of disagreements in NATO regarding Russia's response in the event of its invasion of Ukraine.

Biden said earlier this week that there are disagreements in the North Atlantic Alliance about what measures should be taken in the event of a large-scale Russian invasion of Ukraine.

"There are disagreements in NATO about what exactly the countries intend to do, depending on what is happening (in Russia's action plan against Ukraine - IF)," Biden said during a press conference.

According to him, such disagreements arise due to the fact that serious sanctions against Russia, including those aimed at making currency transactions, will negatively affect both the United States and the European economy. At the same time, Biden expressed confidence that if we are talking not about insignificant actions of Russia, but about a large-scale invasion, then the position of the West will be unified.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 04:05
  • 733
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 22.03 03:49
  • 15
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran