Войти

Now the Pentagon will be paid for catching UFOs

3241
0
0
Image source: vpk-news.ru

The search and identification of the nature of unidentified flying objects (UFOs) has been officially declared one of the important tasks of the Pentagon.

The US Congress has established a special service in the system of the Ministry of Defense — the Department for Tracking Anomalies and Finding out their Nature (ASRO, Anomaly Surveillance and Resolution Office). 

The service will be engaged in a targeted investigation of military reports (mainly pilots) about their meetings with incomprehensible apparatuses on the border of the atmosphere and space. 

The leadership of the American intelligence service counted 144 such reports, about which a special report was provided to Congress in June of this year. 

Six months later, the legislators still decided that the unidentified objects were worth allocating a lot of money for their identification. 

What makes the current decision of Congress (adopted by 363 votes to 70) especially noteworthy is that legislators allocate money for tasks that are almost completely based on assumptions and guesses — this is not hidden by the initiators of the amendments to the NDAA themselves.

Currently, we have no evidence that the NWS are part of foreign intelligence efforts or an example of advanced technologies used by a potential adversary, the authors of the initiative admit.

After the relevant amendments to the budget for 2022 are made by Congress, US military pilots will officially be assigned to track such objects if they appear in the field of view or on radars. They have done this before, but on their own initiative.  

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Страны
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"