Войти

Express readers called the Russian army one of the reasons for the existence of NATO

5025
0
0
Image source: © Фото : British Army/Facebook

MOSCOW, Nov 18 - RIA Novosti. The British Express portal published an article comparing the military might of Moscow and London.

It is noteworthy that the forces of the kingdom were called the "British army" in the title of the material, while the Russian military was united under the surname Putin.

The publication compared the number of military equipment and personnel of the armed forces based on the Global Firepower rating. The Russian army was ahead on almost all points. The authors of the article called these data shocking. The portal admitted that the Russians "significantly bypassed" the British Armed Forces, but noted that London can "boast" of two aircraft carriers — according to the material, it had one more than Moscow.

Netizens, in turn, said in the comments that they were surprised by such a comparison.

"Why does Russia need all these military technologies? If she suddenly needs to conquer Britain, there will be enough boats with jet skis," one of them sneered.

"Why talk about any conflict at all? Compared to Russia, we are nothing. Let's cooperate with powerful countries, not fight with them. Building bridges, I think, is much better than burning them," another urged.

"Do not get involved in a fight where there is no chance of winning," they advised in the comments.

"As a former serviceman, I can say that we objectively do not have soldiers in such quantity and of such quality to bother Russia in any way," the reader of the portal admitted.

"In short, this is the reason why we are a member of NATO. Stupid comparison," the user summed up.

The British military began to be discussed in the media after the Mirror newspaper, citing sources, reported on the country's readiness to transfer up to 600 special forces to Ukraine due to concerns about the "impending invasion" of Russia. Moscow, in turn, recalled that it is not a party to the internal Ukrainian conflict and does not intend to violate the sovereignty of other countries. President Vladimir Putin called the statements about the preparation of the attack "alarmist".

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 11.06 09:09
  • 1
The single Euro destroyer collapsed before takeoff
  • 11.06 06:36
  • 0
Комментарий к "Новые истребители Су-30СМ2 ВМФ России возглавили учения Балтийского флота по имитации атак на цели НАТО (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 11.06 05:29
  • 0
Комментарии к "ОСК представила на МВМС "ФЛОТ-2026" проект НАПЛ "Амур 1650" с ВПУ и ВНЭУ" и "В России представили подлодку «Амур-1650»"
  • 11.06 00:32
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Ростех» рассказал об универсальности «Панциря-МЕ»"
  • 10.06 14:45
  • 16042
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 10.06 13:37
  • 2
The "shock" turbine: how one detail blocked the gas valve to the West
  • 10.06 12:28
  • 6
While the authorities are dragging their feet with Baikal, Omsk has created the Russian Arctic, which is cheaper and more reliable.
  • 10.06 12:11
  • 2
Жидкостные 17-тонные ракеты Ghadr с БЧ в 1000 килограмм ударили по Израилю
  • 10.06 10:42
  • 1
В войска начали поступать комплекты нового обмундирования «Новатор»
  • 10.06 09:13
  • 2
Названы задачи Су-75 в ходе СВО
  • 10.06 08:45
  • 2
Российский «ответ Starlink» потерял новый спутник
  • 10.06 06:59
  • 127
МС-21 готовится к первому полету
  • 10.06 06:30
  • 3
Дуров: Чиновнику, «сломавшему интернет» в РФ, американцы должны вручить медаль
  • 10.06 06:20
  • 1
Britain's fall in the NATO "standings" is a disgrace (The Spectator, Great Britain)
  • 10.06 03:26
  • 1
How France has noticed dozens of new nuclear warheads