Войти

Express readers called the Russian army one of the reasons for the existence of NATO

4898
0
0
Image source: © Фото : British Army/Facebook

MOSCOW, Nov 18 - RIA Novosti. The British Express portal published an article comparing the military might of Moscow and London.

It is noteworthy that the forces of the kingdom were called the "British army" in the title of the material, while the Russian military was united under the surname Putin.

The publication compared the number of military equipment and personnel of the armed forces based on the Global Firepower rating. The Russian army was ahead on almost all points. The authors of the article called these data shocking. The portal admitted that the Russians "significantly bypassed" the British Armed Forces, but noted that London can "boast" of two aircraft carriers — according to the material, it had one more than Moscow.

Netizens, in turn, said in the comments that they were surprised by such a comparison.

"Why does Russia need all these military technologies? If she suddenly needs to conquer Britain, there will be enough boats with jet skis," one of them sneered.

"Why talk about any conflict at all? Compared to Russia, we are nothing. Let's cooperate with powerful countries, not fight with them. Building bridges, I think, is much better than burning them," another urged.

"Do not get involved in a fight where there is no chance of winning," they advised in the comments.

"As a former serviceman, I can say that we objectively do not have soldiers in such quantity and of such quality to bother Russia in any way," the reader of the portal admitted.

"In short, this is the reason why we are a member of NATO. Stupid comparison," the user summed up.

The British military began to be discussed in the media after the Mirror newspaper, citing sources, reported on the country's readiness to transfer up to 600 special forces to Ukraine due to concerns about the "impending invasion" of Russia. Moscow, in turn, recalled that it is not a party to the internal Ukrainian conflict and does not intend to violate the sovereignty of other countries. President Vladimir Putin called the statements about the preparation of the attack "alarmist".

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 24.03 15:57
  • 15077
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 24.03 12:10
  • 3
Нужна ли России морская авиация, и, если да, то какая?
  • 24.03 11:46
  • 1
Трамп неожиданно заявил, что армия США временно прекращает атаковать Иран
  • 24.03 08:31
  • 793
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 23.03 22:40
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Россия не может создать конкурентоспособный автомобиль, но производит лучшие в мире истребители?"
  • 23.03 21:06
  • 0
Комментарий к "Пехота ВСУ меняет свою тактику"
  • 23.03 14:38
  • 26
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 23.03 04:35
  • 1
The Ukrainian Armed Forces infantry is changing its tactics
  • 23.03 04:14
  • 3
ЦАМТО: союзники США заняли выжидательную позицию после призыва Трампа отправить корабли в Персидский залив
  • 23.03 01:59
  • 1
Бортников заявил о способности России привести в чувства спецслужбы Украины
  • 23.03 01:47
  • 1
Комментарий к "Главком ВМФ: заменим все устаревшие многоцелевые АПЛ на современные "Ясени""
  • 22.03 20:12
  • 0
Комментарий к "Путин: российские оборонные наработки еще пригодятся"
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)