Войти

Kiev explained the words about the missiles aimed at Moscow

2602
0
0
Image source: Фото: TASS/Zuma

Statements that Kiev could aim missiles at Moscow were not a threat to Russia, the emphasis was placed on the defensive nature of the country's state policy. This was announced on October 26 by Alexey Arestovich, a freelance adviser to the head of the office of the President of Ukraine.

Arestovich noted that the words about missiles are a response to statements coming from Russia. He also mentioned the frequent threats from Russia against Ukraine.

«The Russians do not hesitate in every program to threaten to bomb Ukraine into the Stone Age, destroy us, prevent us and the like," said Arestovich, quoted by Channel 24.

On October 24, Arestovich said that the actions of the Russian authorities lead to the fact that in the foreseeable future Ukrainian missiles may be aimed at Moscow as a parity.

In turn, the deputy of the State Duma of the VII convocation, political scientist Ruslan Balbek called Arestovich's statement pathetic intimidation. He stressed that Ukraine's missile program is a cloning of Soviet developments, which are very inferior in combat capabilities to modern missile weapons. Arestovich, according to Balbek, prefers to conceal these facts.

Russian Senator from Crimea Sergey Tsekov also criticized Arestovich's statement. According to the parliamentarian, the words of the adviser to the head of the office of the President of Ukraine are self-promotion.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"