Войти

The political scientist assessed the statements about the possible use of weapons by Germany against the Russian Federation

3231
0
0
Image source: Фото: Getty Images/Anadolu Agency

Sergei Sudakov, an American political scientist and corresponding member of the Academy of Military Sciences, commented on the words of German Defense Minister Kramp-Karrenbauer, who said that NATO could use weapons against Russia if necessary.

The expert believes that the North Atlantic Alliance always strives to show its importance at any cost.

"I equate this call with casus belli. It sounds like this: "Shoot down a Russian plane, sink a Russian ship and see what happens. That is, demonstrate that you can attack the Russian Federation." The NATO bloc must always confirm its importance with war and blood. Then it can be dissolved, since it performs not the declared defensive function, but an offensive one. It is necessary to react when we are offered a small victorious war. At the diplomatic level, demand clarification. In addition, there should be an apology from the other side," Sergei Sudakov told NSN journalists.

On October 22, German Defense Minister Annegret Kramp-Karrenbauer said that the North Atlantic Alliance (NATO) should demonstrate to Russia its readiness to use weapons if necessary.

Also on Friday, the first deputy chairman of the State Duma Committee on Energy, Igor Ananskikh, commenting on this statement to Izvestia, stressed that Russia is always ready for external aggression, but it is better to start the process of detente and de-tension.


On October 21, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said that NATO and Secretary General Jens Stoltenberg had driven relations with Russia into a state in which they were not even during the Cold War. She added that in such conditions it is impossible and makes no sense to work with the alliance on challenges and threats to regional and global security.

On the same day, it became known that the heads of defense departments of NATO countries approved a new plan to counter Russia's theoretical attack. Official sources said that the alliance is "still determined to contain Moscow," even though NATO is now paying more attention to China.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 01.08 02:20
  • 0
Об эсминцах, раз уж пошел разговор о возобновлении их постройки в РФ
  • 01.08 00:27
  • 0
Комментарий к "Один стационарный С-200 закрывал площадь сорока дивизионов С-75"
  • 31.07 19:20
  • 0
Комментарий к "Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ"
  • 31.07 19:02
  • 2
Russia has announced its first destroyer program in 40 years. Urgently needed: Ocean-going warships (Military Watch Magazine, USA)
  • 31.07 18:51
  • 0
Комментарий к "Россия объявила о первой за 40 лет программе создания эсминцев. Срочно требуются: океанские боевые корабли (Military Watch Magazine, США)"
  • 31.07 18:37
  • 16347
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 31.07 18:09
  • 1
Госкомвоенпром: ОАО "АЛЕВКУРП" усовершенствовало оптико-электронную систему для ЗРК
  • 31.07 18:00
  • 1
Модернизацию атомного подводного флота назвали важнейшей задачей для развития ВМФ
  • 31.07 17:37
  • 1
Sea revenues: The Caspian Flotilla acquired its own aircraft
  • 31.07 17:18
  • 1
Минобороны: Россия обладает опытом создания масштабных группировок ПВО
  • 31.07 07:33
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чем же была более всего сильна промышленность Российской империи"
  • 31.07 05:53
  • 0
Комментарий к "Чего Европе ждать от задуманной США “НАТО 3.0”? (The Spectator, Великобритания)"
  • 31.07 05:08
  • 0
Комментарий к "Могла ли Россия потерпеть поражение в Первой Мировой Войне?"
  • 31.07 01:56
  • 0
Комментарий к "Почему Суворов взял «неприступный» Измаил, имея меньше солдат, чем защитников"
  • 31.07 01:37
  • 1
What can Europe expect from the US-conceived “NATO 3.0”? (The Spectator, UK)