Войти

The expert called the US demand to remove Iskanders from Europe ridiculous

3911
0
0
Image source: Фото: ИЗВЕСТИЯ/Дмитрий Коротаев

The demand of the special representative of the US president to remove Russian missiles from Europe, which are allegedly placed there, is not justified by anything, said Konstantin Sivkov, a corresponding member of the Russian Academy of Rocket and Artillery Sciences. He stated this in an interview with NSN.

"A ridiculous statement, if only simply because both the Americans and we have withdrawn from this treaty, it does not exist. The main question is: on what basis does he refer to it? In addition, these missiles are not related to the INF Treaty for the reason that they have an operational range, their range is less than 500 km," Sivkov said.

Washington is making such statements to create a "moral, psychological and political base" for the deployment of its missiles in Europe, the expert said.

"This is the first step, then a large-scale campaign will follow to accuse Russia of destabilizing the situation by deploying Iskander missiles in Europe. On this basis, hysteria will be raised and it will be stated that as a response to the Russian threat, it is necessary to deploy medium-range missiles in Europe. Because European countries now do not want to deploy American missiles on their territory," Sivkov concluded.

On October 14, Jeffrey Eberhardt, the US President's special representative for nuclear nonproliferation, demanded that Russia remove the missiles allegedly stationed there from Europe, calling it a violation of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles (INF). So Eberhardt answered the question about how the administration of US President Joe Biden treats the initiative of Russian leader Vladimir Putin to impose moratoriums on the deployment of medium-range and shorter-range missiles in Europe.


In February 2019, the United States accused Russia of non-compliance with the provisions of the Treaty on the Elimination of Intermediate-Range and Shorter-range Missiles due to the presence of the 9M729 missile, whose flight range allegedly exceeds permissible norms, and began the procedure for withdrawing from the treaty. Moscow rejected these accusations and expressed readiness to demonstrate the missile that raised questions, but the United States did not meet them halfway.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5
  • 02.01 02:43
  • 0
Комментарий к "С развертыванием “Орешника” в Белоруссии Россия развивает передовую инфраструктуру для стратегического ядерного сдерживания (Military Watch Magazine, США)"