Войти

The head of the CSTO called groundless fears about the possible sending of soldiers of the organization's member countries to Afghanistan

1796
0
0
Image source: militarynews.ru

Minsk. August 29. INTERFAX-WEST-The fears of citizens of the CSTO member states about the possible sending of soldiers to Afghanistan are groundless, CSTO Secretary General Stanislav Zas said on the air of the STV TV channel on Sunday.

"Won't Afghanistan become a trap, won't we have to send our sons there again? Of course not. These are absolutely groundless fears. The CSTO is an exclusively defensive military-political organization. And the Collective Security Treaty, the Charter of our organization provides for the use of collective defensive forces exclusively within the CSTO area of responsibility, that is, within the borders of our countries," Zas said.

He noted that at the last extraordinary session of the Collective Security Council, the situation in Afghanistan was discussed and a set of measures to minimize threats was developed.

"We have developed a set of measures to minimize these threats: countering drug trafficking, terrorism, illegal migration. But it is clear that the situation there is changing now and it should be carefully studied and taken into account in our activities, including in terms of combating these threats, which have not gone away, and partly even on the contrary - they have become more relevant," Zas said.

Earlier, Zas reported that preparations have begun for the exercises of the CSTO Collective Forces, which will be held near the Tajik-Afghan border in the coming months.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Компании
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 18:11
  • 756
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 22.03 16:22
  • 22
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran