Войти

Russia has no plans to send troops to Afghanistan-Patrushev

2242
0
+1
Image source: © РИА Новости / Григорий Сысоев

Moscow. August 19. INTERFAX - There are no prerequisites for the entry of the Russian military contingent into Afghanistan, Russia will focus on political and diplomatic efforts, said the Secretary of the Security Council of the Russian Federation Nikolai Patrushev.

"There are no prerequisites for this," Patrushev said in an interview with the Izvestia newspaper, answering a question about the possibility of introducing a Russian military contingent into Afghanistan.

"In the Afghan direction, we will focus primarily on political and diplomatic efforts, together with our partners we will look for ways to establish an intra-Afghan dialogue and a peaceful settlement of the problems existing in the country," Patrushev said.

According to him, the Moscow format has been created for these purposes, in particular. "In addition, we attach great importance to the coordinating role of the UN in international efforts for the Afghan settlement," the Secretary of the Security Council said.

"Russia is interested in a peaceful, unified, developing Afghanistan, from whose territory there will be no threats to the region. We are ready to establish a dialogue with those forces that will rely on the will of the Afghan people, follow their aspirations and work to turn Afghanistan into a normally functioning, strong, prosperous state," Patrushev said.

The Taliban ("Taliban", a terrorist organization banned in the Russian Federation) entered Kabul on August 15 and declared that they had liberated Afghanistan, they consider the war to be over. Before that, against the background of the withdrawal of US troops and their allies from Afghanistan, the Taliban conducted a large-scale offensive against the Afghan government forces.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 22.03 01:40
  • 731
Подушка безопасности Ирана на фоне слов Израиля о недостаточности вывоза урана
  • 21.03 22:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Названы российские подлодки 2050-х"
  • 21.03 21:16
  • 0
По поводу "Что было бы, если Российская империя продолжала бы существовать".
  • 21.03 19:40
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать? (литературный ответ)
  • 21.03 19:01
  • 0
Что было бы, если Российская Империя продолжала бы существовать?
  • 21.03 18:48
  • 15061
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 21.03 17:30
  • 13
Мультизадачная гиперзвуковая БРСД на "стэлс" платформах, как условие неядерного сдерживания
  • 20.03 18:43
  • 2
Патрушев: наша военная наука не отстает, а во многом опережает зарубежные разработки в области морских дронов
  • 20.03 11:55
  • 2
Прогнозируемая стоимость создания системы ПРО США "Золотой купол" выросла до 185 млрд. долл.
  • 20.03 00:53
  • 0
К вопросу о стратегии России в сложившейся ситуации.
  • 19.03 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "Проект: ядерное не сдерживание"
  • 19.03 18:38
  • 1
Названо количество запущенных Киевом ракет SCALP и Storm Shadow с начала СВО
  • 19.03 16:04
  • 0
Проект: ядерное не сдерживание
  • 19.03 14:27
  • 0
Москва — Минск: углубление интеграции – закономерно, естественно и взаимовыгодно
  • 19.03 13:39
  • 2
Why didn't China rush to defend Iran