Войти

The UK could not leave troops in Afghanistan after the US left there - Boris Johnson

1593
0
0
Image source: reuters.com

London. August 16. INTERFAX-British Prime Minister Boris Johnson said on Monday that after the withdrawal of US troops from Afghanistan, the British military had no real opportunity to stay there alone, without allies, Sky News reports.

"When the United States made this decision, we felt that it would be wrong to act unilaterally and be an occupying force. We talked to our international partners about this, but it was obvious that this was not possible, " Johnson said.

Downing Street noted that the British authorities continue to monitor the movement of insurgents from the Taliban group (banned in the Russian Federation), and are also doing everything possible to ensure the safety of British citizens who are in Afghanistan. London also announced that it will cooperate with other countries to prevent a humanitarian crisis in Afghanistan.

"It is important that the international community works together to convey to any new government, whatever it may be, that no one wants Afghanistan to become a hotbed of terrorism. Any recognition of the new government of Afghanistan should take place on a joint, not unilateral basis, and we will work on this, " British Prime Minister's spokesman Max Blaine said on Monday.

Earlier, the Taliban announced that they had taken control of the whole of Afghanistan and considered the war they were waging to be over.

The rights to this material belong to
The material is placed by the copyright holder in the public domain
  • The news mentions
Do you want to leave a comment? Register and/or Log in
ПОДПИСКА НА НОВОСТИ
Ежедневная рассылка новостей ВПК на электронный почтовый ящик
  • Discussion
    Update
  • 05.01 06:16
  • 1
Five hotbeds of tension (one of them in Europe), which could trigger World War III in 2026 (Daily Star, UK)
  • 05.01 04:13
  • 0
Ответы на "Российское небо — крепость: как НАТО противостоять A2/AD и системе ПВО России? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 05.01 03:03
  • 0
Комментарий к "В России удивились молчанию «Игл» Венесуэлы"
  • 05.01 02:34
  • 0
Комментарий к "Гарантии безопасности Трампа ненадежны, мистер Зеленский (The New York Times, США)"
  • 05.01 01:02
  • 1
К событиям в Венесуэле
  • 05.01 00:41
  • 0
Комментарий к "«Конкурент B-21 за звание лучшего бомбардировщика»: новый китайский самолёт H-20"
  • 04.01 23:59
  • 12704
Without carrot and stick. Russia has deprived America of its usual levers of influence
  • 04.01 21:17
  • 2
О современных танках, точнее, ОБТ (MBT, по-английски)
  • 04.01 21:08
  • 0
И еще о танковой теме - раз это вызвало интерес на форуме. Что такое "советская танковая школа"
  • 04.01 13:58
  • 15
  • 04.01 09:18
  • 1
The risk of self-fulfilling prophecies: what threats does the Russian senator see
  • 03.01 22:50
  • 0
И еще раз: О роли танков в современной войне.
  • 03.01 13:26
  • 1
  • 02.01 20:18
  • 0
Комментарий к "С-500: российское оружие победы или бумажный тигр? (The National Interest, США)"
  • 02.01 16:23
  • 5