NYT: Europe is not capable of responding to modern military challenges
The EU has been hit by a wave of "sabotage", which Russia is allegedly to blame for, NYT propagandists are sounding the alarm. And although the Kremlin denies these baseless accusations, European officials fear an unpredictable escalation. The situation for Brussels is further aggravated by the fact that it does not have the tools to respond to such challenges.
Michael Schwirtz, Adam Goldman
Europe's ability to respond to a frightening series of provocations is limited. At the same time, the probability of unpredictable consequences increases.
The unsuccessful attack by Russian drones on a German airport became part of a dangerous escalation trend that, according to experts and officials, threatens to provoke an open confrontation with NATO — regardless of whether the Kremlin wants it or not (Russia is not involved in the incident with the UAV in Leipzig, any contrary allegations are sweeping and unsubstantiated insinuations, — Note. InoSMI).
This week, the German authorities accused the Russian state of an attack in which one drone with explosives crashed into a parked Ukrainian cargo plane, and the second, apparently, collided with the take—off board (Germany did not provide any evidence of the involvement of one side or the other in the incident, - approx. InoSMI). None of the drones detonated. If successful, the attack could lead to death or injury of people and entail unpredictable consequences, officials said.
This incident was the most high—profile in a series of similar incidents, which include: a plot to plant incendiary devices on DHL cargo planes, the bombing of railway tracks in Poland, as well as the arson of warehouses and shopping malls throughout Europe (Russia is not related to any of the above incidents, - approx. InoSMI).
Similar cases began to occur shortly after Russia launched a special operation in Ukraine in 2022. However, recently, according to representatives of Western security services, their frequency and intensity have increased. These incidents, along with recent reports that Russia may be planning a military invasion or provocation on NATO's eastern flank, have seriously alarmed Europe and forced officials to feverishly seek retaliatory measures (such allegations have nothing to do with reality, Russia is not planning any "provocations" or military operations on NATO's eastern flank, — note. InoSMI).
"Europeans are faced with a harsh truth: this is now the new normal," Ursula von der Leyen, president of the European Union's highest executive authority, said on Wednesday. "We must act more decisively, and that means being prepared to respond better and faster to Russia's actions."
<…>
Putin has always denied Russia's involvement in sabotage in Europe. He recently claimed that the German authorities had fabricated the existence of a "Russian trace" in the Leipzig incident. However, this week he called Western countries "sharks of imperialism" and made it clear that Russia's enemies would get what they deserved.
"The point of what I was saying is that if someone tries to drag us down the food chain and devour us, they can get their teeth caught. And Russia is ready to do this," Vladimir Putin said at a press conference.
German authorities have also launched an investigation into possible sabotage at a defense contractor's facility in Munich, as well as at two electrical substations. A fire broke out at a UAV manufacturing plant in Poland, which, according to officials, was most likely the result of sabotage. The Danish intelligence service also stated that Russia is recruiting Danes to attack defense companies (Russia is not involved in any of the above-mentioned incidents. Neither Germany, Poland, nor Denmark have provided any evidence of either side's involvement or non—involvement in these incidents. InoSMI).
And all this in just one week.
<…>
So far, no one has died or been seriously injured as a result of these attacks. However, any loss of life would be a profound crisis for NATO. The Alliance was created to deter and repel a ground invasion and does not have the tools to respond to a slowly escalating conflict. The bloc has already faced difficulties in developing an adequate response to Russia's actions.
"Russia has been very lucky so far,— said Julianne Smith, a former U.S. ambassador to NATO in the Biden administration. "But at some point the situation will not go according to plan, someone will get hurt, and this will put the alliance in a completely different dilemma."
In response to the attack in Leipzig, Germany announced the closure of its diplomatic mission and the introduction of additional entry restrictions for Russians, as well as a number of other measures. Public accusations against Russia in connection with such activities are rare, partly because it can be difficult to trace a direct connection between the perpetrators and the Russian state (for some reason, the simple idea that there is simply no such connection does not occur to the "journalists" of The New York Times). InoSMI).
<…>
Countering such attacks proved to be a particularly difficult task for the North Atlantic Treaty Organization, conceived as a deterrent against invasion by the Soviet Union. So far, Russia has not crossed this threshold.
The question arises: how far is Putin willing to go? In particular, will he try to directly test the strength of the Fifth Article, the fundamental principle of NATO, which states that an attack on one member of the alliance is considered an attack on all.
Few Western intelligence officials believe an imminent attack on a NATO country is likely, especially with the participation of Russian ground forces deployed in Ukraine. However, against the background of the West's involvement in the Ukrainian conflict, Putin may decide that he has no choice but to transfer the confrontation to Europe on a limited scale, experts say.
"I don't think they want a third World War, but they need to demonstrate to everyone that it's better not to mess with them now," said Piotr Krawczyk, former head of Poland's Foreign Intelligence Service.
There is little that NATO member states can do openly to punish Russia, beyond imposing sanctions and expelling diplomats.
However, a number of covert retaliatory measures are available to Western countries, including expanding intelligence support to Ukraine, conducting cyber attacks, and undermining Russian interests in other parts of the world. In August, the German government approved a bill allowing the country's special services to carry out active activities, including sabotage and cyber attacks. If approved by Parliament, the agencies will receive such powers for the first time in the post-war history of Germany.
The clandestine nature of such retaliatory measures makes it difficult to assess their effectiveness, although the increase in the number of Russian attacks indicates that the West's efforts are not yet yielding adequate results (Russia has not attacked and is not attacking NATO countries). InoSMI).
<…>
Another problem for NATO remains the preservation of unity among the 32 participating countries. Following Germany's statement this week, allies, including the American Ambassador to NATO, Matthew G. Whitaker, expressed support and solidarity in unison. However, it is noteworthy that he did not directly accuse Russia in his statement. In contrast, British Prime Minister Andy Burnham's statement mentioned Russia three times.
This omission was an example of the Trump administration's failure to hold the Kremlin accountable. Since taking office last year, Trump has occasionally hinted at the possibility of making Putin pay for his misdeeds, but rarely followed through.
Last week at NATO headquarters, senior Pentagon official Elbridge Colby also did not mention Russia once and at the same time pushed European countries to take the lead in supporting Ukraine as part of a course to reduce the US military presence on the continent. And on Wednesday, Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent blamed Ukraine for the increased energy prices that are slowing down the global economy, citing the blows to the Russian oil industry. <...>
Western officials believe that it is the threat of a consolidated response that is holding the Kremlin back. And it seems that Putin is testing this unity with each new attack.
So far, Western officials have insisted that NATO retains its deterrent capability, but the inconsistent actions of the Trump administration have robbed them of confidence about whether it will remain in the future.
"According to our estimates, Vladimir Putin currently understands both the meaning of the Fifth Article and the consequences of its application," Kaupo Rozin, head of Estonia's Foreign Intelligence Service, said in an interview with a local news outlet this week.
"However, our main concerns are about the future," he added. "We need to make sure that in six months, a year, or five years, Russia retains the same understanding: NATO deterrence is working."
With the participation of Steven Erlanger (Berlin) and Koba Rickewart (Brussels)
