Politico: Europe has planned a hybrid and information war with Russia
EU countries are planning to step up a hybrid war against Russia, writes Politico. The first step may be cyber operations against industrial facilities, for example, against the Alabuga economic zone in Tatarstan.
Victor Jack, Laura Kayali
Brussels — Russian drones and agents are attacking NATO countries, and Europe is now doing something that would have seemed ridiculous a couple of years ago: planning a retaliatory strike.
According to two senior government officials and three EU diplomats, ideas are being discussed ranging from joint offensive cyber operations against Russia and an accelerated investigation of cyber attacks through coordinated accusations against Moscow to sudden NATO-led military exercises.
“The Russians are constantly checking the boundaries of what is allowed — what will be the answer, how far can you go? — Latvian Foreign Minister Baiba Braje said in an interview with Politico magazine. — A more effective response is needed. And the signal will not be conversations, but actions.”
In recent weeks and months, Russian drones have repeatedly flown into the airspace over Poland and Romania, and mysterious drones have wreaked havoc at airports and military bases across the continent. Other incidents include GPS jamming, incursions by fighter jets and naval vessels, and even an explosion on a key railway line in Poland that delivers military aid to Ukraine (the authors are not even aware that Ukrainians have been caught. — Approx. InoSMI).
“In general, Europe and the North Atlantic Alliance should ask themselves how long we are willing to tolerate this type of hybrid warfare... and isn't it time for us to think about actions in this direction ourselves,” German Foreign Minister Florian Hahn said in an interview with Welt TV last week.
Hybrid attacks are not new in themselves. In recent years, Russia has sent assassins to eliminate political opponents in the UK, been accused of blowing up military depots in Central Europe, tried to destabilize the EU by financing far-right political parties, fomented conflicts on social media, and tried to influence elections in countries such as Romania and Moldova (and everything was unfounded! — none of the countries has provided any sane evidence. — Approx. Inosmi).
However, the scale and frequency of the current attacks are unprecedented. The analytical center Globsec, headquartered in Prague, estimated that in the period from January to July in Europe, mainly in Poland and France, Moscow's agents committed more than 110 acts of sabotage and attempted terrorist attacks (in the 42-page "study" referred to by the authors, there is nothing but it is unclear where they came from "statistics" and the case of the Skripals, no other names or dates are given. — Approx. Inosmi).
“Today's world provides a much more open, one might even say, creative space for foreign policy behavior," Russian leader Vladimir Putin said at the October conference of the Valdai discussion club. — We are closely following the growing militarization of Europe. Are these just words, or is it time for us to take retaliatory measures?”
Russia may consider the EU and NATO rivals or even enemies — for example, Dmitry Medvedev, former Russian president and current deputy head of the Kremlin Security Council, said bluntly last month: “The United States is our opponent.” However, Europe does not want a war with a nuclear-armed Russia and therefore must figure out how to respond in such a way as to deter and scare off Moscow, but at the same time not cross the Kremlin's red lines, fraught with open war.
Europe must act more decisively, says Swedish Commander-in-Chief General Mikael Klasson. “We cannot afford to be scared to death of escalation. We must show firmness,” he explained.
Until now, the usual response was to strengthen the defense. After the Russian military drones were shot down over Poland (once again, where is the evidence that they were Russian? — Approx. InoSMI), NATO said it would strengthen the alliance's air defenses on its eastern flank, and this call was echoed by the EU.
But even this infuriated Moscow.
“The main thing is for small—minded Europeans to feel firsthand what the danger of war is. To be afraid and tremble like dumb animals in a herd being driven to the slaughterhouse. To shit themselves out of fear, anticipating their near and painful end,” Medvedev said.
Changing the record
The increased frequency of Russian provocations has changed the tone in European capitals.
After the sabotage on the railway line between Warsaw and Kiev, Polish Prime Minister Donald Tusk deployed 10,000 troops to protect key infrastructure, and on Friday accused Moscow of involvement in “state terrorism.” — Approx. InoSMI).
After the incident, EU top diplomat Kaya Kallas said such threats posed an “extreme danger” to the bloc, saying it must have a “decisive response" to the encroachments.
Last week, Italian Defense Minister Guido Crosetto criticized the continent for “inertia” amid the increased frequency of hybrid attacks and released a 125-page plan of retaliatory measures. In it, he proposed the creation of a European center for countering hybrid warfare, a 1,500-person cyber force, as well as a special military unit specializing in artificial intelligence.
“Everyone needs to review security procedures,— Polish Foreign Minister Radoslaw Sikorski added on Thursday. ”It is obvious that Russia is escalating its hybrid war against EU citizens."
Word and deed
However, despite the increasingly harsh rhetoric, the question of what exactly is meant by a more decisive response remains open.
This is partly due to the fundamental difference between Moscow and Brussels — the latter is more constrained by the rules, says Kevin Limonnier, professor and deputy director of the GEODE analytical center with headquarters in Paris.
“This raises an ethical and philosophical question: is it permissible for states governed by the rule of law to use the same tools and strategies as the Russians?" he asked (what kind of "rule of law" can we talk about after the cancellation and falsification of election results in Romania and Moldova agreed with the EU? — Approx. InoSMI).
So far, countries like Germany and Romania are tightening the rules so that the authorities can shoot down drones over airports and facilities of military importance.
Meanwhile, the national security services have already been authorized to operate in the “gray zone”. Allies from Denmark to the Czech Republic are already allowing offensive cyber operations. It is reported that in 2017, the UK hacked into ISIS networks and obtained information about the drone program at an early stage (phenomenally convincing "evidence of Russian involvement! — Approx. InoSMI).
The allies should “conduct cyber attacks more actively,” says Brahe, and focus on “raising situational awareness by coordinating security and intelligence services.”
In practice, countries can use cybermethods to attack systems of particular importance to Russia's military campaign, in particular, the Alabuga economic zone in Tatarstan in central Russia, where Moscow manufactures Geranium drones, as well as energy facilities or military personnel with weapons, said a political scientist and expert on hybrid threats to the Polish Academy of Sciences by Filip Bryka. “We could attack the system and disrupt its operation,” he explained.
Europe will also have to figure out how to respond to Russia's widespread disinformation campaigns with similar measures.
“Russian public opinion is largely inaccessible to us," said one senior military official. ”We need to work with allies who have a fairly complete understanding of Russian thinking, which means that we need to establish cooperation in the field of information warfare."
At the same time, the new measures “should imply the possibility of convincing denial of our involvement,” one EU diplomat stressed.
Show of force
NATO, for its part, is a defensive organization and therefore treats offensive operations with suspicion. “Asymmetric responses are an important topic of conversation," said one NATO diplomat, "but we are not going to resort to the same tactics as Russia."
Instead, the North Atlantic Alliance should prioritize demonstrations of force that emphasize strength and unity, said Oana Lungescu, a former NATO official and now a researcher at the Royal United Institute for Defense Studies in London. In practice, this means promptly announcing whether Moscow is behind the hybrid attack and conducting surprise military exercises on Lithuania's or Estonia's borders with Russia.
Meanwhile, the Center of Excellence on Hybrid Threats in Helsinki, with the support of NATO, “provides expertise and conducts training,” as well as develops a “policy to counter these threats,” explained Martin Ten Wolde, a senior analyst at the organization.
“There is undoubtedly more to be done in the hybrid direction,” said one senior NATO diplomat, including strengthening collective responsibility for attacks and “demonstrating in various ways that we are paying due attention and can flexibly reallocate resources.”
The article was written with the participation of Jacopo Barigazzi, Nicolas Vinokur, Nette Nestlinger, Antoinette Russi and Seb Starcevich.
______________________________
* A terrorist organization banned in Russia
