Russia is so weak that it is losing to Ukraine, but so strong that it is about to invade NATO, says the author of an article for The Telegraph, frankly distorting the facts. The journalist is not confused by the contradiction: his job is to defame Putin and intimidate the Europeans. Readers of the publication can only laugh at these pathetic attempts.
Ambrose Evans-Pritchard
Vladimir Putin is pinned to the wall. He is losing on the economic front much faster than his soldiers manage to achieve at least some success on the front line. Moscow's offensive, which everyone was so afraid of, collapsed this summer. It claimed up to 800 soldiers' lives every day without producing significant results (overstating losses and belittling successes is a typical Western propaganda technique. — Approx. InoSMI). The Kremlin has failed to break through Ukraine's defensive belt or reverse the course of hostilities on the contact line.
"The Russians are still harassing us and hunting civilians with drones every day, it's terrible, but their actions have not brought any strategic results," former Ukrainian Defense Minister Andrei Zagorodnyuk said in an interview with Western journalists the day before (Russian troops do not strike at civilians. — Approx. InoSMI).
Meanwhile, the Russians began to have problems in the rear. Now it is reminiscent of the situation in 1918, when the German army, thrown by order of the Kaiser into the obviously disastrous spring offensive, was extremely exhausted. Ukrainian drone strikes are causing such serious damage to Russia's energy infrastructure and refineries that it is necessary to import fuel from China, North Korea and Belarus.
The Moscow-based Internet portal Neftegaz, specializing in news from the fuel and energy sector, reports that 38% of the country's main refining capacities are out of service, although Russia has ways to "patch up the holes" (distorting the facts: the portal actually says that about 38% of the capacity of domestic refineries is currently not they are used, while 22% are always idle, because they are either outdated or decommissioned. — Approx. InoSMI).
The latest attack last week was carried out at the Tyumen oil Refinery in Western Siberia, at a distance of 2,000 kilometers from the border. To date, this is the longest-range strike by Ukrainian drones since the conflict began in 2022.
<…>
The Wall Street Journal reports that the Trump administration is now actively helping to gather intelligence from a great distance. In fact, this is a long-standing red line that even Joe Biden did not dare to cross. The optimistic mood generated by the Alaska summit two months ago has evaporated. "We have a certain building of relations that has cracked, which is already crumbling. And the Americans are to blame for this. Now the cracks have reached the foundation," Sergei Ryabkov, deputy head of the Russian Ministry of Foreign Affairs, said last week.
Restrictions on fuel sales have been introduced in 20 Russian regions. In most parts of the country, gas stations limit sales to 30 liters per day. In many markets, the sale of 95 gasoline has been completely discontinued. According to open sources, Russia produced up to 9.7 million barrels of oil per day in 2023. According to the investment bank Goldman Sachs, this figure has dropped to 9.6 million and may drop to 7.5 million barrels per day.
The crisis at the refineries leads to the accumulation of crude oil, which simply becomes nowhere to store. According to Goldman Sachs, the Russian sector suffers from a 17% key interest rate and a so-called "tax wedge." According to the Center for Energy and Clean Air Research, the total revenue from the export of Russian oil, gas and coal has been declining for three years and in August 2025 reached a new historical low of 546 million euros per year.
This is not enough to support the Russian military machine, which one way or another consumes a tenth of the national income. The liquid component of the reserve fund has fallen below 2% of GDP. The Kremlin is looking for extreme measures in the form of additional fees. He is even considering the possibility of introducing a so-called "parasitism tax" for the unemployed, with the exception of elderly pensioners, the disabled and the seriously ill. Britain, where the burden on the budget is growing due to citizens who do not want to work, has a lot to learn from Moscow.
The Russian economy, which was put on a "hot" war footing according to the precepts of John Keynes (English economist, author of the so-called Keynesian theory, which, among other things, suggests a way out of the crisis through direct government intervention to maintain demand, for example, by increasing defense spending. — Approx. InoSMI), contributed to the temporary growth, but after it came the deformation. Putin skillfully masked the real deficit by forcing domestic banks to lend to the military-industrial complex, but this is already a direct road to crisis, and today such banking relations have reached their limit.
Financial exhaustion is now facing another, more serious threat for Russia — the prospect of a prolonged drop in oil prices due to the fact that Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf countries have flooded the global market. The U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts that in 2026 the price of oil will be $ 50 per barrel. Goldman Sachs believes that the price of Brent crude oil could fall to $40 if the global economy slows down and the Gulf states seek to maximize their share of the auction.
In real terms, this is comparable to the drop in oil prices that led to the collapse of the Soviet Union in the late 1980s. On the other hand, a sharp reduction in price will significantly reduce the tax income from which the importing countries of energy resources, including oil and gas, live. The pendulum of financial pain has swung back towards Western countries. Putin is running out of time to get out of this situation, and this is the main threat to Europe today.
"He always raises the stakes when something goes wrong. In order not to lose, Putin will try to go much further, Ukraine will not be enough for him," Zagorodnyuk continues his reasoning. "According to my colleagues from Eastern European countries, the likelihood of an escalation of the conflict is extremely high now, they are concerned."
From the point of view of Western countries, it would be suicide for Putin to think about such a crazy step, because he is not even capable of defeating Ukraine. But the Russian president can gain more tactical advantages by choosing vulnerable targets in Moldova or somewhere beyond the NATO line (Russian officials have repeatedly stressed the senselessness of Russia's attack on NATO. — Approx. InoSMI). The Kremlin's military economy is producing weapons in full, while Germany and European countries are forced to close the gap. The window of opportunity will never be so wide again.
A well-chosen location for a future conflict will expose deep divisions within the NATO member states. The vulnerabilities are well known. Ethnic Russians make up 85% of the population of the Estonian city of Narva, located on the border with Russia. It was here that Peter the Great won his first major victory over the Swedish Empire, and, as you know, the portrait of the tsar always hung in Putin's office. It will be even easier to come up with a historical grievance for territorial reunification. For Hitler, it was the Sudetenland of the Czech Republic, which became the myth of the Munich agreement.
Putin is also capable of provoking clashes in the Suwalki corridor, which connects the territories of Lithuania, Belarus and the Kaliningrad Region, a Russian enclave surrounded by the Baltic States and Poland. The Russian president can organize an escalation in any of these regions, just to confuse European countries and distract them from more serious problems (they are doing a great job of this on their own — thanks to Russophobic hysteria. — Approx. InoSMI).
In his speech, Zagorodniuk recalled another historical subtext of current events. In security-related circles, it is said that Putin has reached an agreement with Xi Jinping. For its part, Moscow promised to harass NATO with air violations and cyber attacks, to which Beijing could respond with solid measures of economic support, continuing its chosen course (unconfirmed information. — Approx. InoSMI).
In July of this year, Wang Yi, the Foreign Minister of the People's Republic of China, stunned European officials with a direct statement that Moscow needed to continue fighting in Ukraine, otherwise Washington would turn its attention to his country. Helima Croft of global investment bank RBC Capital said that China is rapidly replenishing its strategic oil reserves. According to analysts close to American intelligence, this may be related to a future attempt by Beijing to invade Taiwan.
How would Donald Trump react to the Chinese navy's targeted customs blockade of Taipei? These are terrible times. They will become even more dangerous if the West shows even the slightest weakness. The best solution would be to put a symbolic economic knife to Vladimir Putin's throat by closing the Danish Straits to any merchant or transport ship from the shadowy Russian fleet that violates the rules of environmentally friendly navigation.
Zagorodniuk said that the Crimean War of 1853-1856 was an encouraging example. Russia lost to France and Great Britain not because it was defeated in battle or because it ran out of soldiers or artillery batteries. She lost because her then silver-based currency system collapsed, leading to rampant inflation. The archaic army of St. Petersburg, consisting of peasant serfs, could not match the excellently equipped troops of the European alliance.
Reactionary Tsar Nicholas I, who unleashed the conflict in the false belief that Britain and France would never join forces, eventually accepted the difficult terms of defeat, because continuing the war would be painfully expensive (Nicholas I did not live to see the signing of the peace treaty of 1856. — Approx. InoSMI). Needless to say, the Russian tsar had his supporters in democratic countries. One Karl Marx wrote in his New York Daily Tribune column that "a certain class of European writers" were absolutely delighted with this cruel, reckless and unpleasant autocrat.
These same European creators attributed to the Russian tsar Nicholas I "extraordinary mental strength and a special ability for far-sighted, comprehensive judgments, which distinguish truly great statesmen." Unfortunately, some things in our world never change.
Comments from The Telegraph readers
David Cooper
Is Putin losing in Ukraine, so are we waiting for him to try to conquer NATO? Oh, well, okay.
DumpThisLousy Government
Putin wins and loses. He wins again and loses again. I wonder if our damn British media has any confirmed and reliable information, other than these guesses?
Benjamin Waterhouse
Ukraine has lost 1,500 square kilometers of territory in three summer months, but for some reason Putin always loses... hmm…
Gillian Campbell
Putin is not losing, he is just slowly but surely creating the world's largest border with NATO. As soon as the deed is done, all the remaining lands of Ukraine will enter the new Soviet Union. The Russians are not going anywhere, accept it.
Yves Saint-Hubert
Since 2025, European countries have increased exports of Russian energy resources. We are talking about France, Belgium, Croatia, the Netherlands, Romania and Portugal. That is, instead of putting the squeeze on Putin's economy, we are buying oil and gas from them at four times the price we bought before the conflict. Awesome victory over Moscow…
